» Articles » PMID: 37430500

Balance Assessment Using a Smartwatch Inertial Measurement Unit with Principal Component Analysis for Anatomical Calibration

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Jul 11
PMID 37430500
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Balance assessment, or posturography, tracks and prevents health complications for a variety of groups with balance impairment, including the elderly population and patients with traumatic brain injury. Wearables can revolutionize state-of-the-art posturography methods, which have recently shifted focus to clinical validation of strictly positioned inertial measurement units (IMUs) as replacements for force-plate systems. Yet, modern anatomical calibration (i.e., sensor-to-segment alignment) methods have not been utilized in inertial-based posturography studies. Functional calibration methods can replace the need for strict placement of inertial measurement units, which may be tedious or confusing for certain users. In this study, balance-related metrics from a smartwatch IMU were tested against a strictly placed IMU after using a functional calibration method. The smartwatch and strictly placed IMUs were strongly correlated in clinically relevant posturography scores (r = 0.861-0.970, < 0.001). Additionally, the smartwatch was able to detect significant variance ( < 0.001) between pose-type scores from the mediolateral (ML) acceleration data and anterior-posterior (AP) rotation data. With this calibration method, a large problem with inertial-based posturography has been addressed, and wearable, "at-home" balance-assessment technology is within possibility.

Citing Articles

Balance Assessment Using a Handheld Smartphone with Principal Component Analysis for Anatomical Calibration.

Anthony E, Kam O, Klisch S, Hazelwood S, Berg-Johansen B Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(17).

PMID: 39275378 PMC: 11397924. DOI: 10.3390/s24175467.

References
1.
Emery C, Cassidy J, Klassen T, Rosychuk R, Rowe B . Development of a clinical static and dynamic standing balance measurement tool appropriate for use in adolescents. Phys Ther. 2005; 85(6):502-14. View

2.
Laidig D, Weygers I, Seel T . Self-Calibrating Magnetometer-Free Inertial Motion Tracking of 2-DoF Joints. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(24). PMC: 9785932. DOI: 10.3390/s22249850. View

3.
Karlsson A, Frykberg G . Correlations between force plate measures for assessment of balance. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2000; 15(5):365-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(99)00096-0. View

4.
Hsieh K, Roach K, Wajda D, Sosnoff J . Smartphone technology can measure postural stability and discriminate fall risk in older adults. Gait Posture. 2018; 67:160-165. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.10.005. View

5.
Park E, Cho M, Ki C . Correct use of repeated measures analysis of variance. Korean J Lab Med. 2009; 29(1):1-9. DOI: 10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.1.1. View