PRAME Expression in Cutaneous Melanoma Does Not Correlate with Disease-specific Survival
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Immunohistochemistry-based protein biomarkers can provide useful prognostic information in cutaneous melanoma. The independent prognostic value of Ki-67 has been studied with variable results. PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry is a useful new ancillary tool for distinguishing cutaneous nevi from melanoma; however, its prognostic value has not been well studied. We evaluated PRAME as a prognostic marker in cutaneous melanoma, compared to Ki-67.
Methods: We analyzed the immunohistochemical expression of PRAME and Ki-67 in 165 melanocytic lesions, including 92 primary melanomas, 19 metastatic melanomas, and 54 melanocytic nevi using tissue microarrays. PRAME immunostaining was scored based on the percentage of positive nuclei: 0 <1%, 1+ 1%-25%, 2+ 26%-50%, 3+ 51%-75%, and 4+ >75%. The percentage of Ki-67-positive tumor nuclei was used to calculate the proliferation index.
Results: PRAME and Ki-67 both showed significantly increased expression in melanomas compared to nevi (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in PRAME expression in primary versus metastatic melanomas. By contrast, the Ki-67 proliferation index was higher in metastatic melanoma than in primary melanoma (p = 0.013). Increased Ki-67 index correlated with ulceration (p < 0.001), increased Breslow depth (p = 0.001), and higher mitotic rate (p < 0.0001), whereas increased PRAME expression correlated with higher mitotic rate (p = 0.047) and Ki-67 index (p = 0.007). Increased Ki-67 index correlated with worse disease-specific survival in patients with primary melanoma (p < 0.001), but PRAME expression did not show prognostic significance in disease-specific survival (p = 0.63). In a multivariable analysis of patients with primary melanoma, tumor Breslow depth, ulceration, mitotic rate, and Ki-67 index were each independent predictors of disease-specific survival (p = 0.006, 0.02, 0.001, and 0.04, respectively); however, PRAME expression was not predictive of disease-specific survival (p = 0.64).
Conclusion: Ki-67 is an independent prognostic marker; although increased PRAME expression correlates with the Ki-67 proliferation index and mitotic rate, PRAME is not an independent prognostic marker for cutaneous melanoma. PRAME and Ki-67 are useful ancillary tools for distinguishing benign from malignant melanocytic lesions.
The Utilization of PRAME in the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Melanoma.
Blount S, Liu X, McBride J Cells. 2024; 13(20.
PMID: 39451258 PMC: 11505691. DOI: 10.3390/cells13201740.
PRAME Immunohistochemistry in Thin Melanomas Compared to Melanocytic Nevi.
Zboras I, Ungureanu L, Senila S, Petrushev B, Zamfir P, Crisan D Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(18).
PMID: 39335694 PMC: 11431529. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14182015.
Love N, Williams C, Killingbeck E, Merleev A, Doost M, Yu L Sci Adv. 2024; 10(28):eadm8206.
PMID: 38996022 PMC: 11244543. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adm8206.
Tapoi D, Gheorghisan-Galateanu A, Gosman L, Derewicz D, Costache M Biomedicines. 2024; 12(6).
PMID: 38927524 PMC: 11202243. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12061318.
Gosman L, Tapoi D, Costache M Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(21).
PMID: 37958863 PMC: 10650804. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242115881.