Mental Counters As an Online Tool for Assessing Working Memory Capacity

Overview

Journal Behav Res Methods

Publisher Springer

Specialty Social Sciences

Date 2023 Jul 10

PMID 37429987

Authors

Lena Hildenbrand

Jennifer Wiley

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Working memory capacity (WMC) describes an individual's ability to focus their attention in the face of interference which allows them to actively maintain and manipulate information in immediate memory. Individual differences in WMC predict a wide range of psychological constructs. The development of online measures can enable data collection from broader, more diverse samples than those typically collected in person in laboratory settings. In addition, logistical challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic have mandated the need for reliable and valid remote assessments of individual differences that are both culture-fair and less susceptible to cheating. This study reports details of a new online version of a Mental Counters task that takes only 10 min to collect and provides evidence for its reliability and convergent validity with other measures including Picture Span and Paper Folding.

References

Ackerman P, Beier M, Boyle M . Working memory and intelligence: the same or different constructs?. Psychol Bull. 2005; 131(1):30-60. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30. View

Arnett P, Higginson C, Voss W, Bender W, Wurst J, Tippin J . Depression in multiple sclerosis: relationship to working memory capacity. Neuropsychology. 1999; 13(4):546-56. DOI: 10.1037//0894-4105.13.4.546. View

Barrett L, Tugade M, Engle R . Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychol Bull. 2004; 130(4):553-73. PMC: 1351135. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553. View

Bunting M . Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006; 32(2):183-196. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.183. View

Cockcroft K, Alloway T, Copello E, Milligan R . A cross-cultural comparison between South African and British students on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales Third Edition (WAIS-III). Front Psychol. 2015; 6:297. PMC: 4358063. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00297. View

Colflesh G, Wiley J . Drunk, but not blind: the effects of alcohol intoxication on change blindness. Conscious Cogn. 2013; 22(1):231-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.01.001. View

Colom R, Shih P, Flores-Mendoza C, Quiroga M . The real relationship between short-term memory and working memory. Memory. 2006; 14(7):804-13. DOI: 10.1080/09658210600680020. View

Conway A, Engle R . Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994; 123(4):354-73. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.123.4.354. View

Copeland D, Radvansky G . Working memory and syllogistic reasoning. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004; 57(8):1437-57. DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000846. View

10.

Engle R . Working Memory and Executive Attention: A Revisit. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018; 13(2):190-193. DOI: 10.1177/1745691617720478. View

11.

Engle R, Tuholski S, Laughlin J, Conway A . Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999; 128(3):309-331. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.128.3.309. View

12.

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

13.

Frey M, Detterman D . Scholastic Assessment or g? The relationship between the Scholastic Assessment Test and general cognitive ability. Psychol Sci. 2004; 15(6):373-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00687.x. View

14.

Goldinger S, Kleider H, Azuma T, Beike D . "Blaming the victim" under memory load. Psychol Sci. 2003; 14(1):81-5. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.01423. View

15.

Henrich J, Heine S, Norenzayan A . The weirdest people in the world?. Behav Brain Sci. 2010; 33(2-3):61-83. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. View

16.

Joormann J, Gotlib I . Updating the contents of working memory in depression: interference from irrelevant negative material. J Abnorm Psychol. 2008; 117(1):182-92. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.117.1.182. View

17.

Kane M, Engle R . Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000; 26(2):336-58. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.2.336. View

18.

Kane M, Engle R . Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003; 132(1):47-70. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.47. View

19.

Kane M, Bleckley M, Conway A, Engle R . A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001; 130(2):169-83. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.169. View

20.

Kane M, Hambrick D, Tuholski S, Wilhelm O, Payne T, Engle R . The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004; 133(2):189-217. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189. View