» Articles » PMID: 37425632

Exploring Novel Aryl/heteroaryl-isosteres of Phenylthiazole Against Multidrug-resistant Bacteria

Overview
Journal RSC Adv
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2023 Jul 10
PMID 37425632
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance has become a concern as a worldwide threat. A novel scaffold of phenylthiazoles was recently evaluated against multidrug-resistant to control the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance, showing good results. Several structural modifications are needed based on the structure-activity relationships (SARs) of this new antibiotic class. Previous studies revealed the existence of two key structural features essential for the antibacterial activity, the guanidine head and lipophilic tail. In this study, a new series of twenty-three phenylthiazole derivatives were synthesized utilizing the Suzuki coupling reaction to explore the lipophilic part. The antibacterial activity was evaluated against a range of clinical isolates. The three most promising compounds, 7d, 15d and 17d, with potent MIC values against MRSA USA300 were selected for further antimicrobial evaluation. The tested compounds exhibited potent results against the tested MSSA, MRSA, and VRSA strains (concentration: 0.5 to 4 μg mL). Compound 15d inhibited MRSA USA400 at a concentration of 0.5 μg mL (one-fold more potent than vancomycin) and showed low MIC values against ten clinical isolates, including linezolid-resistant strain MRSA NRS119 and three vancomycin-resistant isolates VRSA 9/10/12. Moreover, compound 15d retained its potent antibacterial activity using the model by the burden reduction of MRSA USA300 in skin-infected mice. The tested compounds also showed good toxicity profiles and were found to be highly tolerable to Caco-2 cells at concentrations of up to 16 μg mL, with 100% of the cells remaining viable.

Citing Articles

Naphthylthiazoles: a class of broad-spectrum antifungals.

Hagras M, Abutaleb N, Ezzat H, Salama E, Seleem M, Mayhoub A RSC Med Chem. 2023; 14(10):2089-2099.

PMID: 37859711 PMC: 10583822. DOI: 10.1039/d3md00323j.

References
1.
Fridkin S, Hageman J, Morrison M, Sanza L, Como-Sabetti K, Jernigan J . Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in three communities. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(14):1436-44. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa043252. View

2.
Frazee B, Lynn J, Charlebois E, Lambert L, Lowery D, Perdreau-Remington F . High prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in emergency department skin and soft tissue infections. Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 45(3):311-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.10.011. View

3.
Mazumder P, Kalamdhad A, Chaminda G, Kumar M . Coalescence of co-infection and antimicrobial resistance with SARS-CoV-2 infection: The blues of post-COVID-19 world. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng. 2024; 3:100093. PMC: 7897456. DOI: 10.1016/j.cscee.2021.100093. View

4.
Mohammad H, Reddy P, Monteleone D, Mayhoub A, Cushman M, Seleem M . Synthesis and antibacterial evaluation of a novel series of synthetic phenylthiazole compounds against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Eur J Med Chem. 2015; 94:306-16. PMC: 4716659. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.03.015. View

5.
Langford B, So M, Leung V, Raybardhan S, Lo J, Kan T . Predictors and microbiology of respiratory and bloodstream bacterial infection in patients with COVID-19: living rapid review update and meta-regression. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021; 28(4):491-501. PMC: 8619885. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.11.008. View