» Articles » PMID: 37425431

Prognostic Factors and Role of Postoperative Radiotherapy in Surgically Resected Thymomas

Overview
Journal JTCVS Open
Date 2023 Jul 10
PMID 37425431
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate the prognostic factors in and role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for surgically resected thymomas.

Methods: A total of 1540 patients with pathologically confirmed thymomas undergoing resection between 2000 and 2018 were identified retrospectively from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database. Tumors were restaged as local (limited to thymus), regional (invasion to mediastinal fat and other neighboring structures), or distant stage. Disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were calculated by Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results: Tumor stage and histology were independent predictors of both DSS (regional: HR, 3.711; 95% CI, 2.006-6.864; distant: HR, 7.920; 95% CI, 4.061-15.446; type B2/B3: HR, 1.435; 95% CI, 1.008-2.044) and OS (regional: HR, 1.461; 95% CI, 1.139-1.875; distant: HR, 2.551; 95% CI, 1.855-3.509; type B2/B3: HR, 1.409; 95% CI, 1.153-1.723). For patients with regional stage and type B2/B3 thymomas, PORT was associated with better DSS after thymectomy/thymomectomy (HR, 0.268; 95% CI, 0.099-0.727), but the association was not significant after extended thymectomy (HR, 1.514; 95% CI, 0.516-4.44). Among patients with lymph node metastases, those who received PORT (HR, 0.372; 95% CI, 0.146-0.949), chemotherapy (HR, 0.843; 95% CI, 0.303-2.346), or both (HR, 0.296, 95% CI, 0.071-1.236) had a better OS.

Conclusions: The extent of invasion and tumor histology were independent predictors of worse survival following surgical resection of thymoma. Patients with regional invasion and type B2/B3 thymoma who undergo thymectomy/thymomectomy may benefit from PORT, while patients with nodal metastases may benefit from multimodal therapy, including PORT and chemotherapy.

Citing Articles

Perspectives on surgical treatment for thymic epithelial tumors: a narrative review.

Nabe Y, Inoue M, Yoshida J Gland Surg. 2024; 13(2):225-235.

PMID: 38455346 PMC: 10915418. DOI: 10.21037/gs-23-453.

References
1.
Fang W, Wang Y, Pang L, Gu Z, Wei Y, Liu Y . Lymph node metastasis in thymic malignancies: A Chinese multicenter prospective observational study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 156(2):824-833.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.04.049. View

2.
Nakagawa K, Yokoi K, Nakajima J, Tanaka F, Maniwa Y, Suzuki M . Is Thymomectomy Alone Appropriate for Stage I (T1N0M0) Thymoma? Results of a Propensity-Score Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 101(2):520-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.07.084. View

3.
Liu Q, Gu Z, Yang F, Fu J, Shen Y, Wei Y . The role of postoperative radiotherapy for stage I/II/III thymic tumor-results of the ChART retrospective database. J Thorac Dis. 2016; 8(4):687-95. PMC: 4824725. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.03.28. View

4.
Imbimbo M, Ottaviano M, Vitali M, Fabbri A, Leuzzi G, Fiore M . Best practices for the management of thymic epithelial tumors: A position paper by the Italian collaborative group for ThYmic MalignanciEs (TYME). Cancer Treat Rev. 2018; 71:76-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.10.001. View

5.
Marchevsky A, Gupta R, Mckenna R, Wick M, Moran C, Zakowski M . Evidence-based pathology and the pathologic evaluation of thymomas: the World Health Organization classification can be simplified into only 3 categories other than thymic carcinoma. Cancer. 2008; 112(12):2780-8. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23492. View