» Articles » PMID: 37425104

Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Lower Extremity Research

Overview
Date 2023 Jul 10
PMID 37425104
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A large number of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed for specific lower extremity orthopaedic pathologies. However, a consensus as to which PROMs are recommended for use in evaluating treatment outcomes for patients with hip, knee, ankle and/or foot pathology based on the strength of their psychometric properties is lacking.

Objective: To identify PROMs that are recommended in systematic reviews (SRs) for those with orthopaedic hip, knee, foot, and ankle pathologies or surgeries and identify if these PROMs are used in the literature.

Study Design: Umbrella Review.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL, SPORTDisucs and Scopus were searched for SRs through May 2022. A second search was done to count the use of PROMs in seven representative journals from January 2011 through May 2022.SRs that recommended the use of PROMs based on their psychometric properties were included in the first search. SRs or PROMs not available in the English were excluded. The second search included clinical research articles that utilized a PROM. Case reports, reviews, and basic science articles were excluded.

Results: Nineteen SRs recommended 20 PROMs for 15 lower extremity orthopaedic pathologies or surgeries. These results identified consistency between recommended PROMs and utilization in clinical research for only two of the 15 lower extremity pathologies or surgeries. This included the use of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score to assess outcomes (HAGOS) for those with knee osteoarthritis and groin pain, respectively.

Conclusion: A discrepancy was found between the PROMs that were recommended by SRs and those used to assess clinical outcomes in published research. The results of this study will help to produce more uniformity with the use of PROMs that have the most appropriate psychometric properties when the reporting treatment outcomes for those with extremity pathologies.

Level Of Evidence: 3a.

Citing Articles

Concurrent validity of the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation and hip-specific patient-reported outcome measures.

Bergman E, Mulligan E, Patel R, Wells J Bone Jt Open. 2024; 5(10):904-910.

PMID: 39419510 PMC: 11486539. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.510.BJO-2024-0094.R1.


Cross-Culturally Adapted Versions of Patient Reported Outcome Measures for the Lower Extremity.

Zhang Y, Ren J, Zang Y, Guo W, Disantis A, Martin R Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023; V18(3):653-686.

PMID: 37425110 PMC: 10324371. DOI: 10.26603/001c.74528.

References
1.
Hijji F, Schneider A, Pyper M, Laughlin R . The Popularity of Outcome Measures Used in the Foot and Ankle Literature. Foot Ankle Spec. 2019; 13(1):58-68. DOI: 10.1177/1938640019826680. View

2.
Lodhia P, Slobogean G, Noonan V, Gilbart M . Patient-reported outcome instruments for femoroacetabular impingement and hip labral pathology: a systematic review of the clinimetric evidence. Arthroscopy. 2010; 27(2):279-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.08.002. View

3.
Eechaute C, Vaes P, Van Aerschot L, Asman S, Duquet W . The clinimetric qualities of patient-assessed instruments for measuring chronic ankle instability: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007; 8:6. PMC: 1797175. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-6. View

4.
Gagnier J, Huang H, Mullins M, Marinac-Dabic D, Ghambaryan A, Eloff B . Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. JBJS Rev. 2018; 6(1):e2. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00038. View

5.
Robinson J, Cook J, Purdam C, Visentini P, Ross J, Maffulli N . The VISA-A questionnaire: a valid and reliable index of the clinical severity of Achilles tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2001; 35(5):335-41. PMC: 1724384. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.35.5.335. View