Observer Agreement in Single Computerized Tomography Use for Diagnosing Paediatric Head and Neck Malignancies at Uganda Cancer Institute

Overview

Journal J Egypt Natl Canc Inst

Specialty Oncology

Date 2023 Jul 9

PMID 37423951

Authors

Alex Mwesigwa Mugisha

Zeridah Muyinda

Joyce Balagadde Kambugu

Denise Apolot

Elizabeth Atugonza

Anneth Teu

Aloysius Gonzaga Mubuuke

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: In the Ugandan setting, investigation for PHNM with CT uses a protocol with both unenhanced and contrast enhanced procedures hence doubling the ionizing radiation exposure. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of single CT procedures in diagnosing PHNM.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study using CT images from patients, aged fifteen years and below, investigated for head and neck malignancies at the Uganda Cancer Institute. Three radiologists, observers A, B and C, with 12, 5 and 2 years of experience, respectively, participated in the study. They independently reported contrast enhanced images (protocol A), unenhanced images (protocol B), then both unenhanced and contrast enhanced images (protocol C) in 2 months intervals. Inter- and intra- observer agreement was determined using Gwen's Agreement coefficient.

Results: Seventy-three CT scans of 36 boys and 37 girls, with a median age of 9 (3-13) years, were used. Intra-and inter-observer agreement on primary tumour location ranged from substantial to almost perfect with the highest intra-observer agreement observed when protocols A and C were compared. Inter-observer agreement for tumour calcifications was substantial for protocol A. Observers A and C demonstrated an almost perfect intra-observer agreement when protocols A and C were compared. There was a substantial inter-observer agreement on diagnosis for all protocols.

Conclusions: In our setting and examining a limited number of CT images, we demonstrated that contrast-enhanced CT scans provide sufficient information with no evidence of additional value of unenhanced images. Using contrast-enhanced images alone reduced the radiation exposure significantly.

References

Lilja-Fischer J, Schroder H, Nielsen V . Pediatric malignancies presenting in the head and neck. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018; 118:36-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.12.009. View

Akinyele A, Israel A, Akang E . Paediatric head and neck cancers in Nigeria: Implications for treatment planning in resource limited settings. Niger Med J. 2013; 53(4):245-8. PMC: 3640248. DOI: 10.4103/0300-1652.107604. View

Yaris N, Mandiracioglu A, Buyukpamukcu M . Childhood cancer in developing countries. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2004; 21(3):237-53. DOI: 10.1080/08880010490276971. View

Gao Y, Quinn B, Mahmood U, Long D, Erdi Y, St Germain J . A comparison of pediatric and adult CT organ dose estimation methods. BMC Med Imaging. 2017; 17(1):28. PMC: 5406971. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-017-0199-3. View

Hatzoglou V, Omuro A, Haque S, Khakoo Y, Ganly I, Oh J . Second-opinion interpretations of neuroimaging studies by oncologic neuroradiologists can help reduce errors in cancer care. Cancer. 2016; 122(17):2708-14. PMC: 4992439. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30083. View

Imhof H, Czerny C, Hormann M, Krestan C . Tumors and tumor-like lesions of the neck: from childhood to adult. Eur Radiol. 2004; 14 Suppl 4:L155-65. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-2035-0. View

Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim K, Mahesh M, Gould R . Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(22):2078-86. PMC: 4635397. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427. View

Greenwood T, Lopez-Costa R, Rhoades P, Ramirez-Giraldo J, Starr M, Street M . CT Dose Optimization in Pediatric Radiology: A Multiyear Effort to Preserve the Benefits of Imaging While Reducing the Risks. Radiographics. 2015; 35(5):1539-54. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015140267. View

Pierce D, Preston D . Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res. 2000; 154(2):178-86. DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2000)154[0178:rrcral]2.0.co;2. View

10.

Mazonakis M, Tzedakis A, Damilakis J, Gourtsoyiannis N . Thyroid dose from common head and neck CT examinations in children: is there an excess risk for thyroid cancer induction?. Eur Radiol. 2006; 17(5):1352-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0417-9. View

11.

Mathews J, Forsythe A, Brady Z, Butler M, Goergen S, Byrnes G . Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ. 2013; 346:f2360. PMC: 3660619. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2360. View

12.

Brenner D, Hall E . Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(22):2277-84. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra072149. View

13.

Kundel H, Polansky M . Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology. 2003; 228(2):303-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2282011860. View

14.

Landis J, Koch G . An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics. 1977; 33(2):363-74. View

15.

Brennan B . Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006; 1:23. PMC: 1559589. DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-1-23. View

16.

Stambuk H, Patel S, Mosier K, Wolden S, Holodny A . Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: recognizing the radiographic features in children. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005; 26(6):1575-9. PMC: 8149070. View

17.

McErlean A, Panicek D, Zabor E, Moskowitz C, Bitar R, Motzer R . Intra- and interobserver variability in CT measurements in oncology. Radiology. 2013; 269(2):451-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.13122665. View

18.

Brady A, Laoide R, McCarthy P, McDermott R . Discrepancy and error in radiology: concepts, causes and consequences. Ulster Med J. 2013; 81(1):3-9. PMC: 3609674. View

19.

Lloyd C, McHugh K . The role of radiology in head and neck tumours in children. Cancer Imaging. 2010; 10:49-61. PMC: 2842180. DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2010.0003. View

20.

Tshering Vogel D, Thoeny H . Cross-sectional imaging in cancers of the head and neck: how we review and report. Cancer Imaging. 2016; 16(1):20. PMC: 4971750. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-016-0075-3. View