» Articles » PMID: 37418148

Prophylactic Clipping Using the Over-the-scope Clip (OTSC) System After Complex ESD and EMR of Large Colon Polyps

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Jul 7
PMID 37418148
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Delayed bleeding is the most frequent complication after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large colon polyps. Today, prophylactic clipping with through-the-scope clips (TTSCs) is commonly used to reduce the risk of bleeding. However, the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) system might be superior to TTSCs in achieving hemostasis. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic clipping using the OTSC system after ESD or EMR of large colon polyps.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective collected database from 2009 until 2021 of three endoscopic centers. Patients with large (≥ 20 mm) colon polyps were enrolled. All polyps were removed by either ESD or EMR. After the resection, OTSCs were prophylactically applied on parts of the mucosal defect with a high risk of delayed bleeding or/and perforation. The main outcome measurement was delayed bleeding.

Results: A total of 75 patients underwent ESD (67%, 50/75) or EMR (33%, 25/75) in the colorectum. The mean resected specimen diameter was 57 mm ± 24.1 (range 22-98 mm). The mean number of OTSCs placed on the mucosal defect was 2 (range 1-5). None of the mucosal defects were completely closed. Intraprocedural bleeding occurred in 5.3% (ESD 2.0% vs. EMR 12.0%; P = 0.105), and intraprocedural perforation occurred in 6.7% (ESD 8% vs. EMR 4%; P = 0.659) of the patients. Hemostasis was achieved in 100% of cases of intraprocedural bleeding, whereas two patients required surgical conversion due to intraprocedural perforation. Among the remaining 73 patients who received prosphylactic clipping, delayed bleeding occurred in 1.4% (ESD 0% vs. EMR 4.2%; P = 0.329), and delayed perforation occurred in 0%.

Conclusions: The prophylactic partial closure of large post-ESD/EMR mucosal defects using OTSCs could serve as an effective strategy to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding and perforation. The prophylactic partial closure of large complex post-ESD/EMR mucosal defects using OTSCs could serve as an effective strategy to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding and perforation.

Citing Articles

Unique closure of large colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection defect using zigzag clip with line pulley securing technique.

Ono K, Ohata K, Kimoto Y, Takeuchi N, Kano Y, Minato Y VideoGIE. 2025; 10(1):51-53.

PMID: 39925399 PMC: 11806421. DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2024.09.002.


Closure methods for large defects after gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Gong R, Wang S, Song J, He Z, Li P, Zhang S J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024; 39(12):2511-2521.

PMID: 39175260 PMC: 11660212. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16722.

References
1.
Jayanna M, Burgess N, Singh R, Hourigan L, Brown G, Zanati S . Cost Analysis of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Surgery for Large Laterally Spreading Colorectal Lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015; 14(2):271-8.e1-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.08.037. View

2.
Ahlenstiel G, Hourigan L, Brown G, Zanati S, Williams S, Singh R . Actual endoscopic versus predicted surgical mortality for treatment of advanced mucosal neoplasia of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 80(4):668-676. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.04.015. View

3.
Hassan C, Repici A, Sharma P, Correale L, Zullo A, Bretthauer M . Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2015; 65(5):806-20. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308481. View

4.
Peery A, Shaheen N, Cools K, Baron T, Koruda M, Galanko J . Morbidity and mortality after surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 87(1):243-250.e2. PMC: 5634910. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.1550. View

5.
Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, Bhandari P, Dumonceau J, Paspatis G . Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017; 49(3):270-297. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-102569. View