» Articles » PMID: 37418130

Long-Term Prognosis and Treatment Strategy of Persistent PSA After Radical Prostatectomy

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Jul 7
PMID 37418130
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is thought to be undetectable (< 0.1 ng/mL) after radical prostatectomy (RP), and persistent PSA (≥ 0.1 ng/mL) is considered a failure of curative treatment.

Materials And Methods: The study population consisted of 135 patients, all of whom underwent RP for localized prostate cancer, and developed persistent PSA. We set the starting point at the timing of RP, and the endpoints were the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and cancer-specific survival.

Results: Salvage radiation therapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were performed in 53 (39.3%) and 64 (47.4%) patients, respectively. Eighteen (13.3%) patients didn't receive any salvage treatment. During the median follow-up of 10.1 years, CRPC was observed in 23 patients, and 6 patients died due to prostate cancer. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated the 15-year CRPC-free and cancer-specific survivals were 79.5% and 92.7%, respectively. Cox multivariate analysis demonstrated that seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) (p = 0.007) and nadir PSA ≥1.0 ng/mL (p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for CRPC. Salvage RT demonstrated better cancer control (the 10-and 15-year CRPC-free survival was 94.1% and 94.1%) compared to ADT (75.9% and 58.5%, p = 0.017) after 1:1 propensity score matching.

Conclusions: SVI and nadir PSA ≥1.0 ng/mL are independent risk factors for CRPC in patients with persistent PSA after RP. Salvage RT is considered to be the optimal treatment for this condition.

Citing Articles

Survival Patterns Based on First-site-specific Visceral Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Are Outcomes of Visceral Metastases the Same?.

Ahmed M, Mahmoud A, Reitano G, Zeina W, Lehner K, Day C Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024; 66:38-45.

PMID: 39040620 PMC: 11260861. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.06.006.


Editorial Comment to Validation of schedules for optimal PSA monitoring after radical prostatectomy.

Matsumoto K Int J Urol. 2024; 31(4):408-409.

PMID: 38229417 PMC: 11524100. DOI: 10.1111/iju.15397.

References
1.
Hamdy F, Donovan J, Athene Lane J, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P . 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(15):1415-1424. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220. View

2.
Bianchi L, Nini A, Bianchi M, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Suardi N . The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients. Eur Urol. 2016; 69(6):1142-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.010. View

3.
Preisser F, Chun F, Pompe R, Heinze A, Salomon G, Graefen M . Persistent Prostate-Specific Antigen After Radical Prostatectomy and Its Impact on Oncologic Outcomes. Eur Urol. 2019; 76(1):106-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.048. View

4.
Milonas D, Venclovas Z, Sasnauskas G, Ruzgas T . The Significance of Prostate Specific Antigen Persistence in Prostate Cancer Risk Groups on Long-Term Oncological Outcomes. Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(10). PMC: 8158093. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102453. View

5.
Beresford M, Gillatt D, Benson R, Ajithkumar T . A systematic review of the role of imaging before salvage radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy biochemical recurrence. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2009; 22(1):46-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2009.10.015. View