» Articles » PMID: 37415550

Looking Competent Does Not Appeal to All Voters Equally: The Role of Social Class and Politicians' Facial Appearance for Voting Likelihood

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2023 Jul 7
PMID 37415550
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Voters generally value competence in politicians. Four studies, all conducted in Germany, show that this is especially pronounced in people of higher compared with lower social class. The first study, with a representative sample ( = 2239), found that the reported importance of competence in politicians increased with increasing socioeconomic status (SES). This was mediated by self-perceived competence which was higher in participants of higher SES. In three further studies (two preregistered, = 396, = 400) participants merely saw pictures of politicians' faces. Perceived competence based on facial appearance increased the likelihood of voting for a politician. Again, this effect was stronger among participants of higher compared with lower SES. This moderation persisted after controlling for participants' political orientation and politicians' perceived warmth and dominance. We discuss implications for future research on the psychological underpinnings of social class as well as appearance effects in the political context.

Citing Articles

Lower class competence stereotypes of the upper class increase class conflict: mediation by intergroup envy and moderation by upward social mobility belief.

Liu J, Yan L, Zhang Y, Gan J, Yang L Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1360951.

PMID: 38873511 PMC: 11169697. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1360951.


A systematic literature review of the stereotype content model in the fields of psychology and marketing: main themes examined in the literature and an agenda for future research in marketing.

Luna Cortes G Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1392629.

PMID: 38831949 PMC: 11144869. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1392629.

References
1.
Arend M, Schafer T . Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation. Psychol Methods. 2018; 24(1):1-19. DOI: 10.1037/met0000195. View

2.
Tan J, Kraus M, Carpenter N, Adler N . The association between objective and subjective socioeconomic status and subjective well-being: A meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2020; 146(11):970-1020. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000258. View

3.
Oldmeadow J, Fiske S . Social status and the pursuit of positive social identity: Systematic domains of intergroup differentiation and discrimination for high- and low- status groups. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2013; 13(4). PMC: 3852744. DOI: 10.1177/1368430209355650. View

4.
Stephens N, Markus H, Phillips L . Social class culture cycles: how three gateway contexts shape selves and fuel inequality. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013; 65:611-34. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115143. View

5.
Rahal D, Fales M, Haselton M, Slavich G, Robles T . Cues of Social Status: Associations Between Attractiveness, Dominance, and Status. Evol Psychol. 2021; 19(0):14747049211056160. PMC: 8982059. DOI: 10.1177/14747049211056160. View