» Articles » PMID: 37415348

Malaria Diagnosis Using a Combined System of a Simple and Fast Extraction Method with a Lyophilised Dual-LAMP Assay in a Non-endemic Setting

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Malaria is a parasitic disease distributed in tropical areas but with a high number of imported cases in non-endemic countries. The most specific and sensitive malaria diagnostic methods are PCR and LAMP. However, both require specific equipment, extraction procedures and a cold chain. This study aims to solve some limitations of LAMP method with the optimization and validation of six LAMP assays, genus and species-specific, using an easy and fast extraction method, the incorporation of a reaction control assay, two ways (Dual) of result reading and reagent lyophilization. The Dual-LAMP assays were validated against the Nested-Multiplex Malaria PCR. A conventional column and saline extraction methods, and the use of lyophilized reaction tubes were also assessed. A new reaction control Dual-LAMP-RC assay was designed. Dual-LAMP-spp assay showed no cross-reactivity with other parasites, repeatability and reproducibility of 100%, a significant correlation between parasite concentration and time to amplification and a LoD of 1.22 parasites/µl and 5.82 parasites/µl using column and saline extraction methods, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of the six Dual-LAMP assays reach values of 100% or close to this, being lower for the Dual-LAMP-. The Dual-LAMP-RC assay worked as expected. Lyophilized Dual-LAMP results were concordant with the reference method. Dual-LAMP malaria assays with the addition of a new reaction control LAMP assay and the use of a fast and easy saline extraction method, provided low limit of detection, no cross-reactivity, and good sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, the reagent lyophilization and the dual result reading allow their use in most settings.

References
1.
Bustin S, Benes V, Garson J, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M . The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem. 2009; 55(4):611-22. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797. View

2.
Ljolje D, Abdallah R, Lucchi N . Detection of malaria parasites in samples from returning US travelers using the Alethia® Malaria Plus LAMP assay. BMC Res Notes. 2021; 14(1):128. PMC: 8028069. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-021-05542-7. View

3.
Martin Ramirez A, Ta Tang T, Lanza Suarez M, Fernandez A, Munoz Garcia C, Hisam S . Assessment of Commercial Real-Time PCR Assays for Detection of Malaria Infection in a Non-Endemic Setting. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021; 105(6):1732-1737. PMC: 8641344. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0406. View

4.
Polley S, Gonzalez I, Mohamed D, Daly R, Bowers K, Watson J . Clinical evaluation of a loop-mediated amplification kit for diagnosis of imported malaria. J Infect Dis. 2013; 208(4):637-44. PMC: 3719897. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jit183. View

5.
Moehling T, Choi G, Dugan L, Salit M, Meagher R . LAMP Diagnostics at the Point-of-Care: Emerging Trends and Perspectives for the Developer Community. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2021; 21(1):43-61. DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2021.1873769. View