» Articles » PMID: 37414551

Different Forms of Plasticity Interact in Adult Humans

Overview
Journal eNeuro
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Jul 6
PMID 37414551
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neuroplasticity is maximal during development and declines in adulthood, especially for sensory cortices. On the other hand, the motor and prefrontal cortices retain plasticity throughout the lifespan. This difference has led to a modular view of plasticity in which different brain regions have their own plasticity mechanisms that do not depend or translate on others. Recent evidence shows that visual and motor plasticity share common neural mechanisms (e.g., GABAergic inhibition), indicating a possible link between these different forms of plasticity, however, the interaction between visual and motor plasticity has never been tested directly. Here, we show that when visual and motor plasticity are elicited at the same time in adult humans, visual plasticity is impaired, while motor plasticity is spared. Moreover, simultaneous activation of working memory and visual plasticity also leads to impairment in visual plasticity. These unilateral interactions between visual, working memory, and motor plasticity demonstrate a clear link between these three forms of plasticity. We conclude that local neuroplasticity in separate systems might be regulated globally, to preserve overall homeostasis in the brain.

Citing Articles

An anti-Hebbian model for binocular visual plasticity and its attentional modulation.

Chen Z, Cai Y Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):418.

PMID: 40075123 PMC: 11903768. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07833-2.


Exercise-induced neuroplasticity: a new perspective on rehabilitation for chronic low back pain.

Zou J, Hao S Front Mol Neurosci. 2024; 17:1407445.

PMID: 38912176 PMC: 11191426. DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2024.1407445.


Measuring the reliability of binocular rivalry.

Acquafredda M, Sari I, Steinwurzel C, Lunghi C, Binda P J Vis. 2023; 23(10):5.

PMID: 37676671 PMC: 10501494. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.10.5.

References
1.
Butefisch C, Davis B, Wise S, Sawaki L, Kopylev L, Classen J . Mechanisms of use-dependent plasticity in the human motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(7):3661-5. PMC: 16296. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.7.3661. View

2.
Ziemann U, Ilic T, Iliac T, Pauli C, Meintzschel F, Ruge D . Learning modifies subsequent induction of long-term potentiation-like and long-term depression-like plasticity in human motor cortex. J Neurosci. 2004; 24(7):1666-72. PMC: 6730462. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5016-03.2004. View

3.
Sandberg A, Tegner J, Lansner A . A working memory model based on fast Hebbian learning. Network. 2003; 14(4):789-802. View

4.
Hoskison M, Moore A, Hu B, Orsi S, Kobori N, Dash P . Persistent working memory dysfunction following traumatic brain injury: evidence for a time-dependent mechanism. Neuroscience. 2009; 159(2):483-91. PMC: 4264540. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.12.050. View

5.
Binda P, Kurzawski J, Lunghi C, Biagi L, Tosetti M, Morrone M . Response to short-term deprivation of the human adult visual cortex measured with 7T BOLD. Elife. 2018; 7. PMC: 6298775. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.40014. View