Mediation and Moderation of Genetic Risk of Obesity Through Eating Behaviours in Two UK Cohorts

Overview

Journal Int J Epidemiol

Specialty Public Health

Date 2023 Jul 6

PMID 37410385

Authors

Shahina Begum

Eleanor C Hinton

Zoi Toumpakari

Timothy M Frayling

Laura Howe

Laura Johnson

Natalia Lawrence

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The mechanisms underlying genetic predisposition to higher body mass index (BMI) remain unclear.

Methods: We hypothesized that the relationship between BMI-genetic risk score (BMI-GRS) and BMI was mediated via disinhibition, emotional eating and hunger, and moderated by flexible (but not rigid) restraint within two UK cohorts: the Genetics of Appetite Study (GATE) (n = 2101, 2010-16) and the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) (n = 1679, 2014-18). Eating behaviour was measured by the Adult Eating Behaviour Questionnaire and Three-Factor Eating Questionaire-51.

Results: The association between BMI-GRS and BMI were partially mediated by habitual, emotional and situational disinhibition in the GATE/ALSPAC meta-mediation [standardized betaindirect 0.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02-0.06; 0.03, 0.01-0.04; 0.03, 0.01-0.04, respectively] external hunger and internal hunger in the GATE study (0.02, 0.01-0.03; 0.01, 0.001-0.02, respectively). There was evidence of mediation by emotional over/undereating and hunger in the ALSPAC study (0.02, 0.01-0.03; 0.01, 0.001-0.02; 0.01, 0.002-0.01, respectively). Rigid or flexible restraint did not moderate the direct association between BMI-GRS and BMI, but high flexible restraint moderated the effect of disinhibition subscales on BMI (reduction of the indirect mediation by -5% to -11% in GATE/ALSPAC) and external hunger (-5%) in GATE. High rigid restraint reduced the mediation via disinhibition subscales in GATE/ALSPAC (-4% to -11%) and external hunger (-3%) in GATE.

Conclusions: Genetic predisposition to a higher BMI was partly explained by disinhibition and hunger in two large cohorts. Flexible/rigid restraint may play an important role in moderating the impact of predisposition to higher BMI.

Citing Articles

Deciphering the Interplay between Genetic Risk Scores and Lifestyle Factors on Individual Obesity Predisposition.

Chermon D, Birk R Nutrients. 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 38732542 PMC: 11085817. DOI: 10.3390/nu16091296.

Exploring a novel therapeutic strategy: the interplay between gut microbiota and high-fat diet in the pathogenesis of metabolic disorders.

Jia X, Chen Q, Wu H, Liu H, Jing C, Gong A Front Nutr. 2024; 10:1291853.

PMID: 38192650 PMC: 10773723. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1291853.

References

Paternoster L, Standl M, Waage J, Baurecht H, Hotze M, Strachan D . Multi-ancestry genome-wide association study of 21,000 cases and 95,000 controls identifies new risk loci for atopic dermatitis. Nat Genet. 2015; 47(12):1449-1456. PMC: 4753676. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3424. View

Yengo L, Sidorenko J, Kemper K, Zheng Z, Wood A, Weedon M . Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for height and body mass index in ∼700000 individuals of European ancestry. Hum Mol Genet. 2018; 27(20):3641-3649. PMC: 6488973. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddy271. View

Westenhoefer J, Stunkard A, Pudel V . Validation of the flexible and rigid control dimensions of dietary restraint. Int J Eat Disord. 1999; 26(1):53-64. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(199907)26:1<53::aid-eat7>3.0.co;2-n. View

Brunner E, Maruyama K, Shipley M, Cable N, Iso H, Hiyoshi A . Correction: Appetite disinhibition rather than hunger explains genetic effects on adult BMI trajectory. Int J Obes (Lond). 2021; 45(3):711. PMC: 7906901. DOI: 10.1038/s41366-021-00770-0. View

Boyd A, Golding J, Macleod J, Lawlor D, Fraser A, Henderson J . Cohort Profile: the 'children of the 90s'--the index offspring of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Int J Epidemiol. 2012; 42(1):111-27. PMC: 3600618. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dys064. View

Baron R, Kenny D . The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 51(6):1173-82. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173. View

Vainik U, Baker T, Dadar M, Zeighami Y, Michaud A, Zhang Y . Neurobehavioral correlates of obesity are largely heritable. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(37):9312-9317. PMC: 6140494. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1718206115. View

Opel N, Thalamuthu A, Milaneschi Y, Grotegerd D, Flint C, Leenings R . Brain structural abnormalities in obesity: relation to age, genetic risk, and common psychiatric disorders : Evidence through univariate and multivariate mega-analysis including 6420 participants from the ENIGMA MDD working group. Mol Psychiatry. 2020; 26(9):4839-4852. PMC: 8589644. DOI: 10.1038/s41380-020-0774-9. View

Bond M, McDOWELL A, Wilkinson J . The measurement of dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger: an examination of the factor structure of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ). Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001; 25(6):900-6. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801611. View

10.

Llewellyn C, Fildes A . Behavioural Susceptibility Theory: Professor Jane Wardle and the Role of Appetite in Genetic Risk of Obesity. Curr Obes Rep. 2017; 6(1):38-45. PMC: 5359365. DOI: 10.1007/s13679-017-0247-x. View

11.

Herman C, Mack D . Restrained and unrestrained eating. J Pers. 1975; 43(4):647-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00727.x. View

12.

Preacher K, Rucker D, Hayes A . Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions. Multivariate Behav Res. 2016; 42(1):185-227. DOI: 10.1080/00273170701341316. View

13.

Stunkard A, Messick S . The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res. 1985; 29(1):71-83. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8. View

14.

Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

15.

Herle M, Smith A, Kininmonth A, Llewellyn C . The Role of Eating Behaviours in Genetic Susceptibility to Obesity. Curr Obes Rep. 2020; 9(4):512-521. PMC: 7695659. DOI: 10.1007/s13679-020-00402-0. View

16.

Spitzer R, Kroenke K, Williams J, Lowe B . A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166(10):1092-7. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. View

17.

Lesdema A, Fromentin G, Daudin J, Arlotti A, Vinoy S, Tome D . Characterization of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire scores of a young French cohort. Appetite. 2012; 59(2):385-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.05.027. View

18.

Cornelis M, Rimm E, Curhan G, Kraft P, Hunter D, Hu F . Obesity susceptibility loci and uncontrolled eating, emotional eating and cognitive restraint behaviors in men and women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013; 22(5):E135-41. PMC: 3858422. DOI: 10.1002/oby.20592. View

19.

Herman C, Polivy J . Anxiety, restraint, and eating behavior. J Abnorm Psychol. 1975; 84(6):66-72. View

20.

Chaput J, Leblanc C, Perusse L, Despres J, Bouchard C, Tremblay A . Risk factors for adult overweight and obesity in the Quebec Family Study: have we been barking up the wrong tree?. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009; 17(10):1964-70. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2009.116. View