» Articles » PMID: 37409923

Does Rotational Deformity Cause Poor Outcomes After Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures?

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We aimed to show the effect of rotational deformity on the development of cubitus varus deformity (CVD) com-plication after supracondylar humerus fracture surgery.

Methods: Patients with Gartland type II, and more severe fractures treated with Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning alone were included in the study. Rotational deformity was assessed with the formula described by Henderson et al. Patients with rotational deformity >10° were included in Group 1, and patients with deformity <10° in Group 2. In terms of CVD development, patients were evaluated with the Baumann angle measurements made on the carrying angle and final follow-up radiographs. Patients who developed CVD were divided into two groups: Group A included patients who developed CVD and Group B included patients who did not develop CVD. The cosmetic and functional results were evaluated using Flynn criteria.

Results: Eighty-eight patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study, 32 were female and 56 were male. The mean age at the time of surgery was 6.0±2.8 years and the mean follow-up time was 5.1±2.5 years. Based on measurements, Group 1 had 13 patients and Group 2 had 75 patients. Only four of the 88 had developed CVD. Three of these patients had a rotational deformity of ≥20°. The mean age of patients in group A was 2.1 years and the mean carrying angle was 5.7°±1.5° varus (P<0.001). According to the Flynn cosmetic criteria, Group A and Group 1 had significantly worse outcomes (P<0.001).

Conclusion: In conclusion, fixation of the distal fragment in rotation may be associated with CVD and intraoperative assessment is of great value to avoid long-term deformity and cosmetic degradation.

Citing Articles

Elbow rotation affects the accuracy of rotational formulas: validation of a modified method.

Liu Y, Liang X, Sun J, Qu J, Qi B, Yang Y BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):18.

PMID: 39762868 PMC: 11702081. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08240-0.


Associated Factor and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Postoperative Rotational Malreduction in Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fractures.

Seo K, Kim B, Park Y, Lim C Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(5).

PMID: 38792974 PMC: 11123191. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60050791.


A prospective observational study comparing outcomes application of low-frequency pulse electrical combined with target-oriented rehabilitation therapy in postoperative nerve function rehabilitation of patients with distal humeral fracture and....

Shi S, Ou X, Du X Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1370313.

PMID: 38660097 PMC: 11039795. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1370313.

References
1.
Takahara M, Sasaki I, Kimura T, Kato H, Minami A, Ogino T . Second fracture of the distal humerus after varus malunion of a supracondylar fracture in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80(5):791-7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b5.8831. View

2.
Eren A, Guven M, Erol B, Akman B, Ozkan K . Correlation between posteromedial or posterolateral displacement and cubitus varus deformity in supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Child Orthop. 2009; 2(2):85-9. PMC: 2656790. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-008-0088-y. View

3.
Chess D, Leahey J, Hyndman J . Cubitus varus: significant factors. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994; 14(2):190-2. DOI: 10.1097/01241398-199403000-00011. View

4.
BAKALIM G, Wilppula E . Supracondylar humeral fractures in children. Causes of changes in the carrying angle of the elbow. Acta Orthop Scand. 1972; 43(5):366-74. DOI: 10.3109/17453677208998956. View

5.
Voss F, Kasser J, Trepman E, Simmons Jr E, Hall J . Uniplanar supracondylar humeral osteotomy with preset Kirschner wires for posttraumatic cubitus varus. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994; 14(4):471-8. DOI: 10.1097/01241398-199407000-00010. View