Dermatology Patient Perspectives Regarding Consent, Privacy, Security, and Identifiability of Clinical Photography at a Tertiary Cancer Center: A Qualitative Study
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles
Kurtansky N, DAlessandro B, Gillis M, Betz-Stablein B, Cerminara S, Garcia R Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):884.
PMID: 39143096 PMC: 11324883. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-03743-w.
References
1.
Roberts E, Troiano C, Spiegel J
. Standardization of Guidelines for Patient Photograph Deidentification. Ann Plast Surg. 2016; 76(6):611-4.
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000817.
View
2.
Foley G, Timonen V
. Using Grounded Theory Method to Capture and Analyze Health Care Experiences. Health Serv Res. 2014; 50(4):1195-210.
PMC: 4545354.
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12275.
View
3.
Kallio H, Pietila A, Johnson M, Kangasniemi M
. Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. J Adv Nurs. 2016; 72(12):2954-2965.
DOI: 10.1111/jan.13031.
View
4.
Leger M, Wu T, Haimovic A, Kaplan R, Sanchez M, Cohen D
. Patient perspectives on medical photography in dermatology. Dermatol Surg. 2014; 40(9):1028-37.
DOI: 10.1097/01.DSS.0000452632.22081.79.
View
5.
Harting M, DeWees J, Vela K, Khirallah R
. Medical photography: current technology, evolving issues and legal perspectives. Int J Clin Pract. 2015; 69(4):401-9.
DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12627.
View