» Articles » PMID: 37407793

Attention to Space and Time: Independent or Interactive Systems? A Narrative Review

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2023 Jul 5
PMID 37407793
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While there is ample evidence for the ability to selectively attend to where in space and when in time a relevant event might occur, it remains poorly understood whether spatial and temporal attention operate independently or interactively to optimize behavior. To elucidate this important issue, we provide a narrative review of the literature investigating the relationship between the two. The studies were organized based on the attentional manipulation employed (endogenous vs. exogenous) and the type of task (detection vs. discrimination). Although the reviewed findings depict a complex scenario, three aspects appear particularly important in promoting independent or interactive effects of spatial and temporal attention: task demands, attentional manipulation, and their combination. Overall, the present review provides key insights into the relationship between spatial and temporal attention and identifies some critical gaps that need to be addressed by future research.

Citing Articles

Task demand mediates the interaction of spatial and temporal attention.

Palmieri H, Carrasco M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):9228.

PMID: 38649675 PMC: 11035700. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58209-1.


Inhibition and working memory capacity modulate the mental space-time association.

Carmona I, Rodriguez-Rodriguez J, Alvarez D, Noguera C Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 31(6):2634-2645.

PMID: 38639835 PMC: 11680673. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02497-1.

References
1.
Tipper C, Kingstone A . Is inhibition of return a reflexive effect?. Cognition. 2005; 97(3):B55-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.003. View

2.
Doherty J, Rao A, Marsel Mesulam M, Nobre A . Synergistic effect of combined temporal and spatial expectations on visual attention. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(36):8259-66. PMC: 6725546. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1821-05.2005. View

3.
Hayward D, Ristic J . Exposing the cuing task: the case of gaze and arrow cues. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015; 77(4):1088-104. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0877-6. View

4.
Tal-Perry N, Yuval-Greenberg S . The Spatiotemporal Link of Temporal Expectations: Contextual Temporal Expectation Is Independent of Spatial Attention. J Neurosci. 2022; 42(12):2516-2523. PMC: 8944225. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1555-21.2022. View

5.
Jones A . Independent effects of bottom-up temporal expectancy and top-down spatial attention. An audiovisual study using rhythmic cueing. Front Integr Neurosci. 2015; 8:96. PMC: 4285055. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00096. View