» Articles » PMID: 37404790

Prognostic Value of Different Thresholds for Myocardial Scar Quantification on Cardiac MRI Late Gadolinium Enhancement Images in Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the predictive value of different myocardial scar quantification thresholds using cardiac MRI for appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shock and mortality.

Materials And Methods: In this retrospective, two-center observational cohort study, patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy underwent cardiac MRI prior to ICD implantation. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was first determined visually and then quantified by blinded cardiac MRI readers using different SDs above the mean signal of normal myocardium, full-width half-maximum, and manual thresholding. The intermediate signal "gray zone" was calculated as the differences between different SDs.

Results: Among 374 consecutive eligible patients (mean age, 61 years ± 13 [SD]; mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 32% ± 14; secondary prevention, 62.7%), those with LGE had a higher rate of appropriate ICD shock or death than those without (37.5% vs 26.6%, log-rank = .04) over a median follow-up of 61 months. In multivariable analysis, none of the thresholds for quantifying scar was a significant predictor of mortality or appropriate ICD shock, while the extent of gray zone was an independent predictor (adjusted hazard ratio per 1 g = 1.025; 95% CI: 1.008, 1.043; = .005) regardless of the presence or absence of ischemic heart disease ( interaction = .57). Model discrimination was highest for the model incorporating the gray zone (between 2 SD and 4 SD).

Conclusion: Presence of LGE was associated with a higher rate of appropriate ICD shock or death. Although none of the scar quantification techniques predicted outcomes, the gray zone both in infarct and nonischemic scar was an independent predictor and may refine risk stratification. MRI, Scar Quantification, Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator, Sudden Cardiac Death © RSNA, 2023.

References
1.
Piers S, Everaerts K, van der Geest R, Hazebroek M, Siebelink H, Pison L . Myocardial scar predicts monomorphic ventricular tachycardia but not polymorphic ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12(10):2106-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.05.026. View

2.
Becker M, Cornel J, van de Ven P, van Rossum A, Allaart C, Germans T . The Prognostic Value of Late Gadolinium-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Review and Meta-Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018; 11(9):1274-1284. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.03.006. View

3.
STEVENSON W, Friedman P, Sager P, Saxon L, Kocovic D, Harada T . Exploring postinfarction reentrant ventricular tachycardia with entrainment mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29(6):1180-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00065-x. View

4.
Haghbayan H, Lougheed N, Deva D, Chan K, Lima J, Yan A . Peri-Infarct Quantification by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Predict Outcomes in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Prognostic Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 12(11):e009156. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009156. View

5.
de Haan S, Meijers T, Knaapen P, Beek A, van Rossum A, Allaart C . Scar size and characteristics assessed by CMR predict ventricular arrhythmias in ischaemic cardiomyopathy: comparison of previously validated models. Heart. 2011; 97(23):1951-6. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300060. View