» Articles » PMID: 37402596

Patient, Hospital and Environmental Costs of Unnecessary Bloodwork: Capturing the Triple Bottom Line of Inappropriate Care in General Surgery Patients

Overview
Journal BMJ Open Qual
Specialty Health Services
Date 2023 Jul 4
PMID 37402596
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To characterise the extent of unnecessary care in general surgery inpatients using a triple bottom line approach.

Design: Patients with uncomplicated acute surgical conditions were retrospectively evaluated for unnecessary bloodwork according to the triple bottom line, quantifying the impacts on patients, healthcare costs and greenhouse gas emissions. The carbon footprint of common laboratory investigations was estimated using PAS2050 methodology, including emissions generated from the production, transport, processing and disposal of consumable goods and reagents.

Setting: Single-centre tertiary care hospital.

Participants: Patients admitted with acute uncomplicated appendicitis, cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, gallstone pancreatitis and adhesive small bowel obstruction were included in the study. 304 patients met inclusion criteria and 83 were randomly selected for in-depth chart review.

Main Outcome Measures: In each patient population, the extent of over-investigation was determined by comparing ordered laboratory investigations against previously developed consensus recommendations. The quantity of unnecessary bloodwork was measured by number of phlebotomies, tests and blood volume in addition to healthcare costs and greenhouse gas emissions.

Results: 76% (63/83) of evaluated patients underwent unnecessary bloodwork resulting in a mean of 1.84 phlebotomies, 4.4 blood vials, 16.5 tests and 18 mL of blood loss per patient. The hospital and environmental cost of these unnecessary activities was $C5235 and 61 kg COe (974 g COe per person), respectively. The carbon footprint of a common set of investigations (complete blood count, differential, creatinine, urea, sodium, potassium) was 332 g COe. Adding a liver panel (liver enzymes, bilirubin, albumin, international normalised ratio/partial thromboplastin time) resulted in an additional 462 g COe.

Conclusions: We found considerable overuse of laboratory investigations among general surgery patients admitted with uncomplicated acute surgical conditions resulting in unnecessary burden to patients, hospitals and the environment. This study identifies an opportunity for resource stewardship and exemplifies a comprehensive approach to quality improvement.

Citing Articles

The Carbon Footprint of Hospital Services and Care Pathways: A State-of-the-Science Review.

Kouwenberg L, Cohen E, Hehenkamp W, Snijder L, Kampman J, Kucukkeles B Environ Health Perspect. 2024; 132(12):126002.

PMID: 39729358 PMC: 11675664. DOI: 10.1289/EHP14754.


Simplifying coronary artery disease risk stratification: development and validation of a questionnaire-based alternative comparable to clinical risk tools.

Kokkorakis M, Folkertsma P, Anagnostakis F, Sirotin N, Agarwal M, Shantouf R EBioMedicine. 2024; 111:105518.

PMID: 39724785 PMC: 11732493. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105518.


Diagnostic Stewardship Is Environmental Stewardship.

Bastug K, Townley E, Norton L J Grad Med Educ. 2024; 16(6 Suppl):53-57.

PMID: 39677894 PMC: 11644572. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00118.1.


Decarbonizing surgical care: a qualitative systematic review guided by the Congruence Model.

Kloevekorn L, Roemeling O, Fakha A, Hage E, Smailhodzic E BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1456.

PMID: 39580403 PMC: 11585939. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11929-6.


Environmental impact of the enhanced recovery pathway in colorectal surgery: A simulation study.

Slim K, Veziant J, Enguix A, Zieleskiewicz L Colorectal Dis. 2024; 27(1):e17247.

PMID: 39567246 PMC: 11683321. DOI: 10.1111/codi.17247.


References
1.
Vergunst F, Berry H, Rugkasa J, Burns T, Molodynski A, Maughan D . Applying the triple bottom line of sustainability to healthcare research-a feasibility study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2019; 32(1):48-53. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz049. View

2.
Miyakis S, Karamanof G, Liontos M, Mountokalakis T . Factors contributing to inappropriate ordering of tests in an academic medical department and the effect of an educational feedback strategy. Postgrad Med J. 2006; 82(974):823-9. PMC: 2653931. DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.049551. View

3.
MacNeill A, McGain F, Sherman J . Planetary health care: a framework for sustainable health systems. Lancet Planet Health. 2021; 5(2):e66-e68. DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00005-X. View

4.
Romanello M, Di Napoli C, Drummond P, Green C, Kennard H, Lampard P . The 2022 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: health at the mercy of fossil fuels. Lancet. 2022; 400(10363):1619-1654. PMC: 7616806. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01540-9. View

5.
Sedrak M, Patel M, Ziemba J, Murray D, Kim E, Dine C . Residents' self-report on why they order perceived unnecessary inpatient laboratory tests. J Hosp Med. 2016; 11(12):869-872. DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2645. View