Tooth Substance Loss After Incisal Endodontic Access and Novel Single-tooth Template-guided Endodontic Access in Three-dimensional Printed Resin Incisors with Simulated Pulp Canal Calcification: A Comparative Study
Overview
Affiliations
Context Background: Guided endodontics has various applications, one of which is for calcified canal negotiation. Recently, a new single-tooth template has been fabricated to overcome the drawbacks of bulky guides, which are difficult to use with rubber dam isolation.
Aim: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the novel single-tooth template for negotiation of pulp canal calcification (PCC) in three-dimensional (3D)-printed resin incisors by comparing substance loss and time taken between incisal endodontic access (IEA) and single-tooth template-guided endodontic access (SGEA).
Methods: Forty-two resin incisor teeth having patent canal in the apical third were used ( = 21/group). They were subcategorized based on operator's experience into senior endodontist (SE), postgraduate (PG), and undergraduate (UG) ( = 7/operator). Canals were negotiated conventionally for IEA and using the single-tooth template for SGEA. Substance loss was calculated from the volume difference between pre- and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography scans. The time taken was also recorded.
Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired -test and one-way analysis of variance test.
Results: Canals were successfully negotiated in 100% and 95% of teeth in the SGEA and IEA groups, respectively. Overall substance loss and time taken were significantly lesser for SGEA for all operators ( < 0.001). In the IEA group, test showed statistical significance between SE and UG for substance loss ( < 0.05) and SE-UG and PG-UG for time taken ( < 0.05). No significant difference among operators was noted for both parameters in SGEA.
Conclusions: SGEA resulted in significantly lesser substance loss and time taken for canal negotiation in 3D-printed resin incisors with simulated PCC. This was independent of the experience levels of the operator.
Bansal R, Bansal M, Garg R, Bansal D J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025; 28(1):90-95.
PMID: 39974687 PMC: 11835359. DOI: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_533_24.
Dynamic navigation in endodontics: A comprehensive literature review.
Hegde V, Mandke L, Memon K, Ansari M, Srilatha S, Mujawar A J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025; 27(12):1202-1210.
PMID: 39959018 PMC: 11823580. DOI: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_551_24.
Muryani A, Aripin D, Dharsono H, Rajion Z, Wicaksono S Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2025; 17:49-63.
PMID: 39872903 PMC: 11771166. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S491632.