» Articles » PMID: 37398218

Spindle Chirp and Other Sleep Oscillatory Features in Young Children with Autism

Overview
Journal bioRxiv
Date 2023 Jul 3
PMID 37398218
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether spindle chirp and other sleep oscillatory features differ in young children with and without autism.

Methods: Automated processing software was used to re-assess an extant set of polysomnograms representing 121 children (91 with autism [ASD], 30 typically-developing [TD]), with an age range of 1.35-8.23 years. Spindle metrics, including chirp, and slow oscillation (SO) characteristics were compared between groups. SO and fast and slow spindle (FS, SS) interactions were also investigated. Secondary analyses were performed assessing behavioural data associations, as well as exploratory cohort comparisons to children with non-autism developmental delay (DD).

Results: Posterior FS and SS chirp was significantly more negative in ASD than TD. Both groups had comparable intra-spindle frequency range and variance. Frontal and central SO amplitude were decreased in ASD. In contrast to previous manual findings, no differences were detected in other spindle or SO metrics. The ASD group displayed a higher parietal coupling angle. No differences were observed in phase-frequency coupling. The DD group demonstrated lower FS chirp and higher coupling angle than TD. Parietal SS chirp was positively associated with full developmental quotient.

Conclusions: For the first time spindle chirp was investigated in autism and was found to be significantly more negative than in TD in this large cohort of young children. This finding strengthens previous reports of spindle and SO abnormalities in ASD. Further investigation of spindle chirp in healthy and clinical populations across development will help elucidate the significance of this difference and better understand this novel metric.

References
1.
Zonouzi M, Scafidi J, Li P, McEllin B, Edwards J, Dupree J . GABAergic regulation of cerebellar NG2 cell development is altered in perinatal white matter injury. Nat Neurosci. 2015; 18(5):674-82. PMC: 4459267. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3990. View

2.
Piantoni G, Poil S, Linkenkaer-Hansen K, Verweij I, Ramautar J, van Someren E . Individual differences in white matter diffusion affect sleep oscillations. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(1):227-33. PMC: 6618630. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2030-12.2013. View

3.
Malkani R, Zee P . Brain Stimulation for Improving Sleep and Memory. Sleep Med Clin. 2020; 15(1):101-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2019.11.002. View

4.
Dehghani N, Cash S, Halgren E . Topographical frequency dynamics within EEG and MEG sleep spindles. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010; 122(2):229-35. PMC: 2978261. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.06.018. View

5.
Knoblauch V, Munch M, Blatter K, Martens W, Schroder C, Schnitzler C . Age-related changes in the circadian modulation of sleep-spindle frequency during nap sleep. Sleep. 2005; 28(9):1093-101. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/28.9.1093. View