» Articles » PMID: 37397879

Significant Subgraph Mining for Neural Network Inference with Multiple Comparisons Correction

Overview
Journal Netw Neurosci
Publisher MIT Press
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Jul 3
PMID 37397879
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We describe how the recently introduced method of significant subgraph mining can be employed as a useful tool in neural network comparison. It is applicable whenever the goal is to compare two sets of unweighted graphs and to determine differences in the processes that generate them. We provide an extension of the method to dependent graph generating processes as they occur, for example, in within-subject experimental designs. Furthermore, we present an extensive investigation of the error-statistical properties of the method in simulation using Erdős-Rényi models and in empirical data in order to derive practical recommendations for the application of subgraph mining in neuroscience. In particular, we perform an empirical power analysis for transfer entropy networks inferred from resting-state MEG data comparing autism spectrum patients with neurotypical controls. Finally, we provide a Python implementation as part of the openly available IDTxl toolbox.

References
1.
Dudoit S, van der Laan M, Pollard K . Multiple testing. Part I. Single-step procedures for control of general type I error rates. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2006; 3:Article13. DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1040. View

2.
Zalesky A, Fornito A, Bullmore E . Network-based statistic: identifying differences in brain networks. Neuroimage. 2010; 53(4):1197-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.041. View

3.
Bullmore E, Sporns O . Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10(3):186-98. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2575. View

4.
Shimada Y, Hirata Y, Ikeguchi T, Aihara K . Graph distance for complex networks. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:34944. PMC: 5057156. DOI: 10.1038/srep34944. View

5.
Tarone R . A modified Bonferroni method for discrete data. Biometrics. 1990; 46(2):515-22. View