Tool Mastering Today - an Interdisciplinary Perspective

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2023 Jul 3

PMID 37397285

Authors

Ricarda I Schubotz

Sonja J Ebel

Birgit Elsner

Peter H Weiss

Florentin Worgotter

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Tools have coined human life, living conditions, and culture. Recognizing the cognitive architecture underlying tool use would allow us to comprehend its evolution, development, and physiological basis. However, the cognitive underpinnings of tool mastering remain little understood in spite of long-time research in neuroscientific, psychological, behavioral and technological fields. Moreover, the recent transition of tool use to the digital domain poses new challenges for explaining the underlying processes. In this interdisciplinary review, we propose three building blocks of tool mastering: (A) perceptual and motor abilities integrate to tool manipulation knowledge, (B) perceptual and cognitive abilities to functional tool knowledge, and (C) motor and cognitive abilities to means-end knowledge about tool use. This framework allows for integrating and structuring research findings and theoretical assumptions regarding the functional architecture of tool mastering via behavior in humans and non-human primates, brain networks, as well as computational and robotic models. An interdisciplinary perspective also helps to identify open questions and to inspire innovative research approaches. The framework can be applied to studies on the transition from classical to modern, non-mechanical tools and from analogue to digital user-tool interactions in virtual reality, which come with increased functional opacity and sensorimotor decoupling between tool user, tool, and target. By working towards an integrative theory on the cognitive architecture of the use of tools and technological assistants, this review aims at stimulating future interdisciplinary research avenues.

References

Grafton S, F de C Hamilton A . Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. Hum Mov Sci. 2007; 26(4):590-616. PMC: 2042582. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.05.009. View

Chen Q, Garcea F, Mahon B . The Representation of Object-Directed Action and Function Knowledge in the Human Brain. Cereb Cortex. 2015; 26(4):1609-18. PMC: 4785951. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu328. View

Kahrs B, Lockman J . Tool Using. Child Dev Perspect. 2014; 8(4):231-236. PMC: 4230570. DOI: 10.1111/cdep.12087. View

Elsner B . Infants' imitation of goal-directed actions: the role of movements and action effects. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006; 124(1):44-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.09.006. View

Petrides M, Pandya D . Distinct parietal and temporal pathways to the homologues of Broca's area in the monkey. PLoS Biol. 2009; 7(8):e1000170. PMC: 2714989. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000170. View

Mizelle J, Wheaton L . The Neuroscience of Storing and Molding Tool Action Concepts: How "Plastic" is Grounded Cognition?. Front Psychol. 2011; 1:195. PMC: 3153804. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00195. View

Osiurak F, Badets A . Tool use and affordance: Manipulation-based versus reasoning-based approaches. Psychol Rev. 2016; 123(5):534-68. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000027. View

Moser A, Zimmermann L, Dickerson K, Grenell A, Barr R, Gerhardstein P . They can interact, but can they learn? Toddlers' transfer learning from touchscreens and television. J Exp Child Psychol. 2015; 137:137-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.04.002. View

Osiurak F, Reynaud E . The elephant in the room: What matters cognitively in cumulative technological culture. Behav Brain Sci. 2019; 43:e156. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X19003236. View

10.

Rounis E, Humphreys G . Limb apraxia and the "affordance competition hypothesis". Front Hum Neurosci. 2015; 9:429. PMC: 4516886. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00429. View

11.

Jacobs D, Adair J, Williamson D, Na D, Gold M, Foundas A . Apraxia and motor-skill acquisition in Alzheimer's disease are dissociable. Neuropsychologia. 1999; 37(7):875-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00139-0. View

12.

Mulcahy N, Call J . Apes save tools for future use. Science. 2006; 312(5776):1038-40. DOI: 10.1126/science.1125456. View

13.

German T, Defeyter M . Immunity to functional fixedness in young children. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001; 7(4):707-12. DOI: 10.3758/bf03213010. View

14.

Horner V, Whiten A . Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Anim Cogn. 2004; 8(3):164-81. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-004-0239-6. View

15.

Heldstab S, Isler K, Schuppli C, van Schaik C . When ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny: Fixed neurodevelopmental sequence of manipulative skills among primates. Sci Adv. 2020; 6(30):eabb4685. PMC: 7380958. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abb4685. View

16.

Tennie C, Call J, Tomasello M . Ratcheting up the ratchet: on the evolution of cumulative culture. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009; 364(1528):2405-15. PMC: 2865079. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0052. View

17.

Morgan T, Uomini N, Rendell L, Chouinard-Thuly L, Street S, Lewis H . Experimental evidence for the co-evolution of hominin tool-making teaching and language. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:6029. PMC: 4338549. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7029. View

18.

Colbourne J, Auersperg A, Lambert M, Huber L, Volter C . Extending the Reach of Tooling Theory: A Neurocognitive and Phylogenetic Perspective. Top Cogn Sci. 2021; 13(4):548-572. PMC: 7616289. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12554. View

19.

Bonawitz E, Ferranti D, Saxe R, Gopnik A, Meltzoff A, Woodward J . Just do it? Investigating the gap between prediction and action in toddlers' causal inferences. Cognition. 2010; 115(1):104-17. PMC: 3121255. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.001. View

20.

Allritz M, Call J, Schweller K, McEwen E, de Guinea M, Janmaat K . Chimpanzees () navigate to find hidden fruit in a virtual environment. Sci Adv. 2022; 8(25):eabm4754. PMC: 9232100. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abm4754. View