» Articles » PMID: 37397244

Nuclear Shapes Are Geometrically Determined by the Excess Surface Area of the Nuclear Lamina

Overview
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2023 Jul 3
PMID 37397244
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nuclei have characteristic shapes dependent on cell type, which are critical for proper cell function, and nuclei lose their distinct shapes in multiple diseases including cancer, laminopathies, and progeria. Nuclear shapes result from deformations of the sub-nuclear components-nuclear lamina and chromatin. How these structures respond to cytoskeletal forces to form the nuclear shape remains unresolved. Although the mechanisms regulating nuclear shape in human tissues are not fully understood, it is known that different nuclear shapes arise from cumulative nuclear deformations post-mitosis, ranging from the rounded morphologies that develop immediately after mitosis to the various nuclear shapes that roughly correspond to cell shape ( elongated nuclei in elongated cells, flat nuclei in flat cells). We formulated a mathematical model to predict nuclear shapes of cells in various contexts under the geometric constraints of fixed cell volume, nuclear volume and lamina surface area. Nuclear shapes were predicted and compared to experiments for cells in various geometries, including isolated on a flat surface, on patterned rectangles and lines, within a monolayer, isolated in a well, or when the nucleus is impinging against a slender obstacle. The close agreement between predicted and experimental shapes demonstrates a simple geometric principle of nuclear shaping: the excess surface area of the nuclear lamina (relative to that of a sphere of the same volume) permits a wide range of highly deformed nuclear shapes under the constraints of constant surface area and constant volume. When the lamina is smooth (tensed), the nuclear shape can be predicted entirely from these geometric constraints alone for a given cell shape. This principle explains why flattened nuclear shapes in fully spread cells are insensitive to the magnitude of the cytoskeletal forces. Also, the surface tension in the nuclear lamina and nuclear pressure can be estimated from the predicted cell and nuclear shapes when the cell cortical tension is known, and the predictions are consistent with measured forces. These results show that excess surface area of the nuclear lamina is the key determinant of nuclear shapes. When the lamina is smooth (tensed), the nuclear shape can be determined purely by the geometric constraints of constant (but excess) nuclear surface area, nuclear volume, and cell volume, for a given cell adhesion footprint, independent of the magnitude of the cytoskeletal forces involved.

Citing Articles

Actin from within - how nuclear myosins and actin regulate nuclear architecture and mechanics.

Gawor M, Lehka L, Lambert D, Toseland C J Cell Sci. 2025; 138(3).

PMID: 39927755 PMC: 11883275. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.263550.


Extreme wrinkling of the nuclear lamina is a morphological marker of cancer.

Wang T, Dollahon C, Mishra S, Patel H, Abolghasemzade S, Singh I NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024; 8(1):276.

PMID: 39623008 PMC: 11612457. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00775-8.


Matrix stiffness drives drop like nuclear deformation and lamin A/C tension-dependent YAP nuclear localization.

Wang T, Abolghasemzade S, McKee B, Singh I, Pendyala K, Mohajeri M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10151.

PMID: 39578439 PMC: 11584751. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54577-4.


Biomaterials Mimicking Mechanobiology: A Specific Design for a Specific Biological Application.

Donati L, Valicenti M, Giannoni S, Morena F, Martino S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(19).

PMID: 39408716 PMC: 11476540. DOI: 10.3390/ijms251910386.


Engineering Microgel Packing to Tailor the Physical and Biological Properties of Gelatin Methacryloyl Granular Hydrogel Scaffolds.

Jaberi A, Kedzierski A, Kheirabadi S, Tagay Y, Ataie Z, Zavari S Adv Healthc Mater. 2024; 13(25):e2402489.

PMID: 39152936 PMC: 11828485. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202402489.


References
1.
Smith E, Meng Y, Moore R, Tse J, Xu A, Xu X . Nuclear envelope structural proteins facilitate nuclear shape changes accompanying embryonic differentiation and fidelity of gene expression. BMC Cell Biol. 2017; 18(1):8. PMC: 5237523. DOI: 10.1186/s12860-017-0125-0. View

2.
Elosegui-Artola A, Andreu I, Beedle A, Lezamiz A, Uroz M, Kosmalska A . Force Triggers YAP Nuclear Entry by Regulating Transport across Nuclear Pores. Cell. 2017; 171(6):1397-1410.e14. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.008. View

3.
Hatch E, Hetzer M . Nuclear envelope rupture is induced by actin-based nucleus confinement. J Cell Biol. 2016; 215(1):27-36. PMC: 5057282. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201603053. View

4.
Katiyar A, Tocco V, Li Y, Aggarwal V, Tamashunas A, Dickinson R . Nuclear size changes caused by local motion of cell boundaries unfold the nuclear lamina and dilate chromatin and intranuclear bodies. Soft Matter. 2019; 15(45):9310-9317. PMC: 6870954. DOI: 10.1039/c9sm01666j. View

5.
Singh I, Lele T . Nuclear Morphological Abnormalities in Cancer: A Search for Unifying Mechanisms. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2022; 70:443-467. PMC: 9722227. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_16. View