» Articles » PMID: 37396954

Catch the Drift: Depressive Symptoms Track Neural Response During More Efficient Decision-making for Negative Self-referents

Overview
Date 2023 Jul 3
PMID 37396954
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Adolescence is a time of heightened risk for developing depression and also a critical period for the development and integration of self-identity. Despite this, the relation between the neurophysiological correlates of self-referential processing and major depressive symptoms in youth is not well understood. Here, we leverage computational modeling of the self-referential encoding task (SRET) to identify behavioral moderators of the association between the posterior late positive potential (LPP), an event-related potential associated with emotion regulation, and youth self-reported symptoms of depression. Specifically, within a drift-diffusion framework, we evaluated whether the association between the posterior LPP and youth symptoms of major depression was moderated by drift rate, a parameter reflecting processing efficiency during self-evaluative decisions.

Methods: A sample of 106 adolescents, aged 12 to 17 (53% male; = 14.49, = 1.70), completed the SRET with concurrent high-density electroencephalography and self-report measures of depression and anxiety.

Results: Findings indicated a significant moderation: for youth showing greater processing efficiency (drift rate) when responding to negative compared to positive words, larger posterior LPPs predicted greater depressive symptom severity.

Limitations: We relied on a community sample and our study was cross-sectional in nature. Future longitudinal work with clinically depressed youth would be beneficial.

Conclusions: Our results suggest a neurobehavioral model of adolescent depression wherein efficient processing of negative information co-occurs with increased demands on affective self-regulation. Our findings also have clinical relevance; youth's neurophysiological response (posterior LPP) and performance during the SRET may serve as a novel target for tracking treatment-related changes in one's self-identity.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the relative predictive validity of measures of self-referential processing for depressive symptom severity.

Tan E, Tan H, Fong K, Tey S, Rane N, Ho C Front Psychiatry. 2025; 15:1463116.

PMID: 39995765 PMC: 11847881. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1463116.

References
1.
Thurston M, Goldin P, Heimberg R, Gross J . Self-views in social anxiety disorder: The impact of CBT versus MBSR. J Anxiety Disord. 2017; 47:83-90. PMC: 5376221. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.01.001. View

2.
Weinberg A, Sandre A . Distinct Associations Between Low Positive Affect, Panic, and Neural Responses to Reward and Threat During Late Stages of Affective Picture Processing. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018; 3(1):59-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.09.013. View

3.
Gotlib I, Joormann J . Cognition and depression: current status and future directions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010; 6:285-312. PMC: 2845726. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131305. View

4.
Cuthbert B, Schupp H, Bradley M, Birbaumer N, Lang P . Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biol Psychol. 2000; 52(2):95-111. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00044-7. View

5.
Derry P, Kuiper N . Schematic processing and self-reference in clinical depression. J Abnorm Psychol. 1981; 90(4):286-97. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.90.4.286. View