The Effects of Covert Narcissism on Chinese College Students Cyberbullying: The Mediation of Hostile Attribution Bias and the Moderation of Self-Control

Overview

Journal Psychol Res Behav Manag

Publisher Dove Medical Press

Specialty Social Sciences

Date 2023 Jul 3

PMID 37396405

Authors

Xiaohong Fang

Kai Zhang

Jie Chen

Meitao Chen

Yanyan Wang

Jianping Zhong

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The prevalence of cyberbullying has increased along with the growth of social media, which has brought about many adverse effects on individual development. The current study aimed to explore the connection between covert narcissism and cyberbullying and to test the roles of hostile attribution bias and self-control in the relationship between covert narcissism and cyberbullying.

Materials And Methods: A total of 672 Chinese college students filled up questionnaires measuring covert narcissism, cyberbullying, hostile attribution bias, and self-control.

Results: The results indicated that covert narcissism positively and significantly predicted cyberbullying. Hostile attribution bias partially mediated the relationship between covert narcissism and cyberbullying. Additionally, self-control moderated the relationship between covert narcissism and cyberbullying. Specifically, the positive predictive effect of covert narcissism on cyberbullying gradually weakened as self-control improved.

Conclusion: This study explored the underlying mechanism of cyberbullying and found that covert narcissism could affect cyberbullying through hostile attribution bias. Self-control moderated the relationship between covert narcissism and cyberbullying. The results have significant implications for the intervention and prevention of cyberbullying and additional evidence for the relationship between covert narcissism and cyberbullying.

References

Tehrani H, Yamini S . Dataset of parenting practices, self-control and anti-social behaviors: Meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Data Brief. 2020; 32:106114. PMC: 7452709. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106114. View

Coccaro E, Noblett K, McCloskey M . Attributional and emotional responses to socially ambiguous cues: validation of a new assessment of social/emotional information processing in healthy adults and impulsive aggressive patients. J Psychiatr Res. 2009; 43(10):915-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.01.012. View

Wink P . Two faces of narcissism. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991; 61(4):590-7. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.4.590. View

Zhu C, Huang S, Evans R, Zhang W . Cyberbullying Among Adolescents and Children: A Comprehensive Review of the Global Situation, Risk Factors, and Preventive Measures. Front Public Health. 2021; 9:634909. PMC: 8006937. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.634909. View

Sourander A, Klomek A, Ikonen M, Lindroos J, Luntamo T, Koskelainen M . Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: a population-based study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010; 67(7):720-8. DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.79. View

Li C, Sun Y, Ho M, You J, Shaver P, Wang Z . State narcissism and aggression: The mediating roles of anger and hostile attributional bias. Aggress Behav. 2016; 42(4):333-45. DOI: 10.1002/ab.21629. View

Emmons R . Narcissism: theory and measurement. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987; 52(1):11-7. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.1.11. View

Fan C, Chu X, Zhang M, Zhou Z . Are Narcissists More Likely to Be Involved in Cyberbullying? Examining the Mediating Role of Self-Esteem. J Interpers Violence. 2016; 34(15):3127-3150. DOI: 10.1177/0886260516666531. View

Law H, Falkenbach D . Hostile Attribution Bias as a Mediator of the Relationships of Psychopathy and Narcissism With Aggression. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2017; 62(11):3355-3371. DOI: 10.1177/0306624X17742614. View

10.

KOHUT H . Forms and transformations of narcissism. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1966; 14(2):243-72. DOI: 10.1177/000306516601400201. View

11.

Anderson C, Bushman B . Human aggression. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001; 53:27-51. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231. View

12.

Vazire S, Funder D . Impulsivity and the self-defeating behavior of narcissists. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006; 10(2):154-65. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_4. View

13.

Kjaervik S, Bushman B . The link between narcissism and aggression: A meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2021; 147(5):477-503. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000323. View

14.

Kircaburun K, Jonason P, Griffiths M, Aslanargun E, Emirtekin E, Tosuntas S . Childhood Emotional Abuse and Cyberbullying Perpetration: The Role of Dark Personality Traits. J Interpers Violence. 2019; 36(21-22):NP11877-NP11893. DOI: 10.1177/0886260519889930. View

15.

Smith P, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russell S, Tippett N . Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008; 49(4):376-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x. View

16.

Pornari C, Wood J . Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: the role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggress Behav. 2009; 36(2):81-94. DOI: 10.1002/ab.20336. View

17.

Wei H, Liu M . Loving Your Parents and Treating Others Well: The Effect of Filial Piety on Cyberbullying Perpetration and Its Functional Mechanism Among Chinese Graduate Students. J Interpers Violence. 2020; 37(11-12):NP8670-NP8695. DOI: 10.1177/0886260520978182. View

18.

Nasby W, Hayden B, DePaulo B . Attributional bias among aggressive boys to interpret unambiguous social stimuli as displays of hostility. J Abnorm Psychol. 1980; 89(3):459-68. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.89.3.459. View

19.

Choe D, Lane J, Grabell A, Olson S . Developmental precursors of young school-age children's hostile attribution bias. Dev Psychol. 2013; 49(12):2245-2256. DOI: 10.1037/a0032293. View

20.

van Reijswoud B, Debast I, Videler A, Rossi G, Lobbestael J, Segal D . Severity Indices of Personality Problems-Short Form in Old-Age Psychiatry: Reliability and Validity. J Pers Assess. 2020; 103(2):174-182. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1743710. View