» Articles » PMID: 37396073

Proprioception Analysis Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Stabilometry: A Prospective, Longitudinal Study

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Jul 3
PMID 37396073
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

 Commonly used methods for measuring proprioception have resulted in conflicting reports regarding knee proprioception with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and the influence of ACL reconstruction.  One hundred subjects (50 patients with radiologically and arthroscopically confirmed unilateral ACL rupture and 50 normal controls) were assessed with regards to proprioception using dynamic single-leg stance postural stabilometry. Instrumented knee ligament laxity and knee outcome scores were also measured. Of the 50 patients in the ACL group, 34 underwent reconstruction and were reassessed postoperatively.  There was a significant proprioceptive deficiency in the ACL group compared with their contralateral knee (  < 0.001) and to the control group (  = 0.01). There was a significant improvement in knee proprioception following ACL reconstruction compared to preoperative findings (  = 0.003). There was no correlation between ligament laxity measurements and outcome scores. A significant correlation was found preoperatively between outcome scores and proprioception measurements. This correlation was not found post-operatively. Pre-operative proprioception testing had a significant correlation (r = 0.46) with post-operative proprioception (  = 0.006).  Patients with an ACL rupture had a proprioceptive deficit which improved following ligament reconstruction. Knee outcome scores had a better correlation with proprioception than ligament laxity. Proprioception may be a superior objective measure than ligament laxity in quantifying functional knee deficits and outcomes in patients with ACL ruptures.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of virtual reality technology in rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Li Y, Peng J, Cao J, Ou Y, Wu J, Ma W PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0314766.

PMID: 40029868 PMC: 11875343. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314766.


Implications of Stabilometric Assessment in Determining Functional Deficits in Patients with Severe Knee Osteoarthritis: Observational Study.

Neculaes M, Hernandez-Lucas P, Lucaci P J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38892890 PMC: 11172977. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113181.

References
1.
Beard D, Kyberd P, Fergusson C, Dodd C . Proprioception after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. An objective indication of the need for surgery?. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993; 75(2):311-5. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B2.8444956. View

2.
Dejour H, Walch G, Deschamps G, Chambat P . [Arthrosis of the knee in chronic anterior laxity]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1987; 73(3):157-70. View

3.
Duthon V, Barea C, Abrassart S, Fasel J, Fritschy D, Menetrey J . Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005; 14(3):204-13. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-005-0679-9. View

4.
Reider B, Arcand M, Diehl L, Mroczek K, Abulencia A, Stroud C . Proprioception of the knee before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19(1):2-12. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2003.50006. View

5.
Tegner Y, Lysholm J . Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; (198):43-9. View