» Articles » PMID: 37393399

The Utility of PET for Detecting Corticotropinomas in Cushing Disease: a Scoping Review

Overview
Journal Neurosurg Rev
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2023 Jul 1
PMID 37393399
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the current standard imaging method for diagnosing and localizing corticotropinomas in Cushing disease, it can fail to detect adenomas in up to 40% of cases. Recently, positron emission tomography (PET) has shown promise as a diagnostic tool to detect pituitary adenomas in Cushing disease. We perform a scoping review to characterize the uses of PET in diagnosing Cushing disease, with a focus on describing the types of PET investigated and defining PET-positive disease. A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Thirty-one studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria, consisting of 10 prospective studies, 8 retrospective studies, 11 case reports, and 2 illustrative cases with a total of 262 patients identified. The most commonly utilized PET modalities in prospective/retrospective studies were FDG PET (n = 5), MET PET (n = 5), 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET (n = 2), 13N-ammonia PET (n = 2), and 68 Ga-DOTA-CRH PET (n = 2). MRI positivity ranged from 13 to 100%, while PET positivity ranged from 36 to 100%. In MRI-negative disease, PET positivity ranged from 0 to 100%. Five studies reported the sensitivity and specificity of PET, which ranged from 36 to 100% and 50 to 100%, respectively. PET shows promise in detecting corticotropinomas in Cushing disease, including MRI-negative disease. MET PET has been highly investigated and has demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity. However, preliminary studies with FET PET and 68 Ga-DOTA-CRH PET show promise for achieving high sensitivity and specificity and warrant further investigation.

Citing Articles

EANM position on positron emission tomography in suspected functional pituitary neuroendocrine tumours.

Van Weehaeghe D, Lapauw B, Fraioli F, Cecchin D, Verger A, Guedj E Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(8):2367-2370.

PMID: 38687371 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06728-4.

References
1.
Barrou Z, Abecassis J, Guilhaume B, Thomopoulos P, Bertagna X, Derome P . [Magnetic resonance imaging in Cushing disease. Prediction of surgical results]. Presse Med. 1997; 26(1):7-11. View

2.
Stroud A, Dhaliwal P, Alvarado R, Winder M, Jonker B, Grayson J . Outcomes of pituitary surgery for Cushing's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pituitary. 2020; 23(5):595-609. DOI: 10.1007/s11102-020-01066-8. View

3.
Kasaliwal R, Sankhe S, Lila A, Budyal S, Jagtap V, Sarathi V . Volume interpolated 3D-spoiled gradient echo sequence is better than dynamic contrast spin echo sequence for MRI detection of corticotropin secreting pituitary microadenomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012; 78(6):825-30. DOI: 10.1111/cen.12069. View

4.
Oldfield E, Doppman J, Nieman L, Chrousos G, Miller D, Katz D . Petrosal sinus sampling with and without corticotropin-releasing hormone for the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325(13):897-905. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199109263251301. View

5.
Fleseriu M, Auchus R, Bancos I, Ben-Shlomo A, Bertherat J, Biermasz N . Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing's disease: a guideline update. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021; 9(12):847-875. PMC: 8743006. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00235-7. View