» Articles » PMID: 37386847

An Augmented Likelihood Approach for the Cox Proportional Hazards Model with Interval-censored Auxiliary and Validated Outcome Data-with Application to the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialties Public Health
Science
Date 2023 Jun 30
PMID 37386847
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In large epidemiologic studies, it is typical for an inexpensive, non-invasive procedure to be used to record disease status during regular follow-up visits, with less frequent assessment by a gold standard test. Inexpensive outcome measures like self-reported disease status are practical to obtain, but can be error-prone. Association analysis reliant on error-prone outcomes may lead to biased results; however, restricting analyses to only data from the less frequently observed error-free outcome could be inefficient. We have developed an augmented likelihood that incorporates data from both error-prone outcomes and a gold standard assessment. We conduct a numerical study to show how we can improve statistical efficiency by using the proposed method over standard approaches for interval-censored survival data that do not leverage auxiliary data. We extend this method for the complex survey design setting so that it can be applied in our motivating data example. Our method is applied to data from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos to assess the association between energy and protein intake and the risk of incident diabetes. In our application, we demonstrate how our method can be used in combination with regression calibration to additionally address the covariate measurement error in self-reported diet.

References
1.
Shaw P, Deffner V, Keogh R, Tooze J, Dodd K, Kuchenhoff H . Epidemiologic analyses with error-prone exposures: review of current practice and recommendations. Ann Epidemiol. 2018; 28(11):821-828. PMC: 6734186. DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.09.001. View

2.
LaVange L, Kalsbeek W, Sorlie P, Aviles-Santa L, Kaplan R, Barnhart J . Sample design and cohort selection in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Ann Epidemiol. 2010; 20(8):642-9. PMC: 2921622. DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.05.006. View

3.
Baldoni P, Sotres-Alvarez D, Lumley T, Shaw P . On the Use of Regression Calibration in a Complex Sampling Design With Application to the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Am J Epidemiol. 2021; 190(7):1366-1376. PMC: 8245895. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwab008. View

4.
Zee J, Xie S . Assessing treatment effects with surrogate survival outcomes using an internal validation subsample. Clin Trials. 2015; 12(4):333-41. PMC: 4450363. DOI: 10.1177/1740774515583488. View

5.
Zeng D, Mao L, Lin D . Maximum likelihood estimation for semiparametric transformation models with interval-censored data. Biometrika. 2016; 103(2):253-271. PMC: 4890294. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asw013. View