» Articles » PMID: 37378120

A Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded With Different Orthodontic Adhesives

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2023 Jun 28
PMID 37378120
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to examine the strength of the bonding between orthodontic brackets and different orthodontic adhesives.

Materials And Methods: To achieve this, the researchers selected 120 extracted premolars and divided them into four groups randomly. Then, one of the three adhesives, Transbond XT, Bracepaste, or Heliosit, was used to join the brackets together. After bonding, the force needed to remove the brackets was tested, and the amount of adhesive that remained on the tooth surface was also noted (referred to as the adhesive remnant index or ARI).

Results: The results showed that Transbond XT had an average bond strength of 18.05 ± 5.6 MPa, Bracepaste had an average bond strength of 16.6 ± 5.1 MPa, and Heliosit had an average bond strength of 16.2 ± 4 MPa. The average bond strength and ARI scores for Transbond XT and Bracepaste were similar at 11.10 MPa. The study found that the light-cured composite adhesives provided the strongest bond and left the tooth surface smoother and cleaner.

Conclusion: In conclusion, the study presented significant information about the impact on the enamel surface as well as the strength of the bond between orthodontic brackets and different adhesives.

Citing Articles

Can a Novel Device with Pure Dry Air Increase the Shear Bond Strength of Dental Composites to Dentin? An Experimental Study.

Kharma K, Hardan L, Kassis C, Dimitriu B, Harouny R, Baba N Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(6).

PMID: 38920861 PMC: 11203141. DOI: 10.3390/dj12060160.


Evaluation of the Curing of the Primer on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An Original Research.

Gupta E, Chaugule T, Gurrala C, Nath G, Priya C, Kudagi V J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024; 16(Suppl 1):S180-S182.

PMID: 38595347 PMC: 11000932. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_446_23.

References
1.
Fox N, McCabe J, Buckley J . A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod. 1994; 21(1):33-43. DOI: 10.1179/bjo.21.1.33. View

2.
Schmidlin P, Sener B, Attin T, Wiegand A . Protection of sound enamel and artificial enamel lesions against demineralisation: caries infiltrant versus adhesive. J Dent. 2012; 40(10):851-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.003. View

3.
Scougall-Vilchis R, Zarate-Diaz C, Kusakabe S, Yamamoto K . Bond strengths of different orthodontic adhesives after enamel conditioning with the same self-etching primer. Aust Orthod J. 2010; 26(1):84-9. View

4.
Scougall Vilchis R, Yamamoto S, Kitai N, Yamamoto K . Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136(3):425-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.024. View

5.
BUONOCORE M . A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955; 34(6):849-53. DOI: 10.1177/00220345550340060801. View