» Articles » PMID: 37372671

Sport Anxiety, Fear of Negative Evaluation, Stress and Coping As Predictors of Athlete's Sensitivity to the Behavior of Supporters

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Jun 28
PMID 37372671
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the study was to find predictors of athlete sensitivity to the positive or negative behaviors of supporters and determine a relationship between athletes' sensitivity to the positive and negative behaviors of supporters and traits such as anxiety and stress or the strategies used to cope with stress. The sample consisted of 171 professional athletes. The study determined three variables that are predictors of athlete sensitivity to the positive behavior of supporters (SPS), i.e., strategies of coping with stress, such as high levels of coachability, confidence and achievement motivation and low levels of freedom from worry (change R = 0.15, F of change = 9.78, of change < 0.001). The predictors of sensitivity to the negative behavior of supporters (SNS) are as follows: a low level of freedom from worry and a high level of fear of negative evaluation (change R = 0.31, F of change = 38.56, of change < 0.001). In the context of the athlete's position, the predictors of SPS for midfielders are as follows: high level of susceptibility to stress and two strategies of coping with stress, i.e., peaking under pressure and concentration. For forwarders they are as follows: high level of worry and coping with stress via goal-setting, while for defenders, the ways of coping with stress are confidence and achievement motivation. In terms of SNS, for defenders, the predictors are low levels of freedom from worry, coachability, and a high level of fear of negative evaluation. Forwarders, who are sensitive to the negative behavior of supporters, are characterized by a fear of negative evaluation.

Citing Articles

Testosterone/cortisol ratio: gender effect and prediction of podium results in beach sprint master rowers.

Ficarra G, Rottura M, Mannucci C, Caccamo D, Bitto A, Trimarchi F Front Sports Act Living. 2024; 6:1466619.

PMID: 39687495 PMC: 11646765. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1466619.


Mpox in sports: A comprehensive framework for anticipatory planning and risk mitigation in football based on lessons from COVID-19.

Chamari K, Ben Saad H, Dhahbi W, Washif J, El Omri A, Zmijewski P Biol Sport. 2024; 41(4):317-335.

PMID: 39416489 PMC: 11475015. DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.144014.

References
1.
Hagan Jr J, Pollmann D, Schack T . Interaction between Gender and Skill on Competitive State Anxiety Using the Time-to-Event Paradigm: What Roles Do Intensity, Direction, and Frequency Dimensions Play?. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:692. PMC: 5430064. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00692. View

2.
Isorna-Folgar M, Leiros-Rodriguez R, Lopez-Roel S, Garcia-Soidan J . Effects of a Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Intervention on the Rowers of the Junior Spain National Team. Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(12). PMC: 9778338. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122357. View

3.
Bond Jr C, Titus L . Social facilitation: a meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychol Bull. 1983; 94(2):265-92. View

4.
Di Salvo V, Baron R, Tschan H, Calderon Montero F, Bachl N, Pigozzi F . Performance characteristics according to playing position in elite soccer. Int J Sports Med. 2006; 28(3):222-7. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-924294. View

5.
Sterkowicz-Przybycien K, Sterkowicz S, Zak S . Sport skill level and gender with relation to age, physical development and special fitness of the participants of Olympic volleyball tournament Beijing 2008. Coll Antropol. 2014; 38(2):511-6. View