» Articles » PMID: 37372272

Models of the Translation Process and the Free Energy Principle

Overview
Journal Entropy (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Jun 28
PMID 37372272
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Translation process research (TPR) has generated a large number of models that aim at explaining human translation processes. In this paper, I suggest an extension of the monitor model to incorporate aspects of relevance theory (RT) and to adopt the free energy principle (FEP) as a generative model to elucidate translational behaviour. The FEP-and its corollary, active inference-provide a general, mathematical framework to explain how organisms resist entropic erosion so as to remain within their phenotypic bounds. It posits that organisms reduce the gap between their expectations and observations by minimising a quantity called . I map these concepts on the translation process and exemplify them with behavioural data. The analysis is based on the notion of translation units (TUs) which exhibit observable traces of the translator's epistemic and pragmatic engagement with their translation environment, (i.e., the text) that can be measured in terms of translation effort and effects. Sequences of TUs cluster into translation states (steady state, orientation, and hesitation). Drawing on active inference, sequences of translation states combine into translation policies that reduce expected free energy. I show how the notion of free energy is compatible with the concept of , as developed in RT, and how essential concepts of the monitor model and RT can be formalised as deep temporal generative models that can be interpreted under a representationalist view, but also support a non-representationalist account.

Citing Articles

An Active Inference Agent for Modeling Human Translation Processes.

Carl M Entropy (Basel). 2024; 26(8).

PMID: 39202086 PMC: 11353518. DOI: 10.3390/e26080616.

References
1.
Hartsuiker R, Pickering M . Language integration in bilingual sentence production. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007; 128(3):479-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.005. View

2.
Smith R, Friston K, Whyte C . A step-by-step tutorial on active inference and its application to empirical data. J Math Psychol. 2022; 107. PMC: 8956124. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2021.102632. View

3.
Murphy E, Holmes E, Friston K . Natural language syntax complies with the free-energy principle. Synthese. 2024; 203(5):154. PMC: 11068586. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-024-04566-3. View

4.
Franchak J, Adolph K . Affordances as Probabilistic Functions: Implications for Development, Perception, and Decisions for Action. Ecol Psychol. 2014; 26(1-2):109-124. PMC: 4061982. DOI: 10.1080/10407413.2014.874923. View

5.
Friston K, Lin M, Frith C, Pezzulo G, Hobson J, Ondobaka S . Active Inference, Curiosity and Insight. Neural Comput. 2017; 29(10):2633-2683. DOI: 10.1162/neco_a_00999. View