Enhancing Radiation Dose Efficiency in Prospective ECG-Triggered Coronary CT Angiography Using Calcium-Scoring CT

Overview

Journal Diagnostics (Basel)

Specialty Radiology

Date 2023 Jun 28

PMID 37370957

Authors

Muhammad Taha Hagar

Martin Soschynski

Matthias Benndorf

Thomas Stein

Jana Taron

Christopher L Schlett

Fabian Bamberg

Tobias Krauss

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: This study investigates whether the scan length adjustment of prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using calcium-scoring CT (CAS-CT) images can reduce overall radiation doses.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 182 patients who underwent CAS-CT and prospectively ECG-triggered CCTA using a second-generation Dual-Source CT scanner. CCTA planning was based on CAS-CT images, for which simulated scout view planning was performed for comparison. Effective doses were compared between two scenarios: Scenario 1-CAS-CT-derived CCTA + CAS-CT and Scenario 2-scout-view-derived CCTA without CAS-CT. Dose differences were further analyzed with respect to scan mode and body mass index.

Results: Planning CCTA using CAS-CT led to a shorter scan length than planning via scout view (114.3 ± 9.7 mm vs. 133.7 ± 13.2 mm, < 0.001). The whole-examination effective dose was slightly lower for Scenario 1 (3.2 [1.8-5.3] mSv vs. 3.4 [1.5-5.9] mSv; < 0.001, = 182). Notably, Scenario 1 resulted in a significantly lower radiation dose for sequential scans and obese patients. Only high-pitch spiral CCTA showed dose reduction in Scenario 2.

Conclusions: Using CAS-CT for planning prospectively ECG-triggered CCTA reduced the overall radiation dose administered compared to scout view planning without CAS-CT, except for high-pitch spiral CCTA, where a slightly opposite effect was observed.

Citing Articles

Achieving low radiation dose and contrast agents dose in coronary CT angiography at 60-kVp ultra-low tube voltage.

He W, Huang F, Wu X, Xie A, Sun W, Liu P BMC Med Imaging. 2025; 25(1):73.

PMID: 40038586 PMC: 11877812. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-025-01608-1.

Evaluating small coronary stents with dual-source photon-counting computed tomography: effect of different scan modes on image quality and performance in a phantom.

Stein T, von Zur Muhlen C, Verloh N, Schurmann T, Krauss T, Soschynski M Diagn Interv Radiol. 2024; 31(1):29-38.

PMID: 39463047 PMC: 11701693. DOI: 10.4274/dir.2024.242893.

References

Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Grunenfelder J, Marincek B . Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26(15):1482-7. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi261. View

Abada H, Larchez C, Daoud B, Sigal-Cinqualbre A, Paul J . MDCT of the coronary arteries: feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 186(6 Suppl 2):S387-90. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.0216. View

Cury R, Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Berman D, Bittencourt M . CAD-RADS™ 2.0 - 2022 Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System: An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American College of Radiology (ACR), and.... J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022; 16(6):536-557. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.07.002. View

Soschynski M, Hagar M, Taron J, Krauss T, Ruile P, Hein M . Update for the Performance of CT Coronary Angiography - Evidence-Based Application and Technical Guidance According to Current Consensus Guidelines and Practical Advice from the Clinical Routine. Rofo. 2022; 194(6):613-624. DOI: 10.1055/a-1747-3554. View

Halliburton S, Abbara S, Chen M, Gentry R, Mahesh M, Raff G . SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011; 5(4):198-224. PMC: 3391026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.06.001. View

Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid F, Scheffel H, Stinn B, Marincek B . Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(9):1809-17. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-0966-1. View

Kalia N, Cespedes L, Youssef G, Li D, Budoff M . Motivational effects of coronary artery calcium scores on statin adherence and weight loss. Coron Artery Dis. 2014; 26(3):225-30. DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000207. View

Juarez-Orozco L, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Prescott E, Ballo H, Bax J . Impact of a decreasing pre-test probability on the performance of diagnostic tests for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 20(11):1198-1207. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez054. View

Menke J, Unterberg-Buchwald C, Staab W, Sohns J, Seif Amir Hosseini A, Schwarz A . Head-to-head comparison of prospectively triggered vs retrospectively gated coronary computed tomography angiography: Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose. Am Heart J. 2013; 165(2):154-63.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.026. View

10.

Abbara S, Blanke P, Maroules C, Cheezum M, Choi A, Han B . SCCT guidelines for the performance and acquisition of coronary computed tomographic angiography: A report of the society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee: Endorsed by the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging.... J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016; 10(6):435-449. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.10.002. View

11.

Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C . 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2019; 41(3):407-477. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425. View

12.

. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020; 396(10258):1204-1222. PMC: 7567026. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9. View

13.

Arnett D, Blumenthal R, Albert M, Buroker A, Goldberger Z, Hahn E . 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74(10):1376-1414. PMC: 8344373. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.009. View

14.

Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, Deliseo A, Razzini C, Tomassini M, Sperandio M . Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J. 2004; 25(12):1043-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.03.024. View

15.

Pontana F, Duhamel A, Pagniez J, Flohr T, Faivre J, Hachulla A . Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol. 2010; 21(3):636-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1991-4. View

16.

Stocker T, Deseive S, Leipsic J, Hadamitzky M, Chen M, Rubinshtein R . Reduction in radiation exposure in cardiovascular computed tomography imaging: results from the PROspective multicenter registry on radiaTion dose Estimates of cardiac CT angIOgraphy iN daily practice in 2017 (PROTECTION VI). Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(41):3715-3723. PMC: 6455904. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy546. View

17.

Kosmala A, Petritsch B, Weng A, Bley T, Gassenmaier T . Radiation dose of coronary CT angiography with a third-generation dual-source CT in a "real-world" patient population. Eur Radiol. 2018; 29(8):4341-4348. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5856-6. View

18.

Gang Y, Chen X, Li H, Wang H, Li J, Guo Y . A comparison between manual and artificial intelligence-based automatic positioning in CT imaging for COVID-19 patients. Eur Radiol. 2021; 31(8):6049-6058. PMC: 7975236. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07629-4. View

19.

Mitchell J, Fergestrom N, Gage B, Paisley R, Moon P, Novak E . Impact of Statins on Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72(25):3233-3242. PMC: 6309473. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.051. View

20.

Leschka S, Kim C, Baumueller S, Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Marincek B . Scan length adjustment of CT coronary angiography using the calcium scoring scan: effect on radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194(3):W272-7. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2970. View