» Articles » PMID: 37370650

Robust Removal of Slow Artifactual Dynamics Induced by Deep Brain Stimulation in Local Field Potential Recordings Using SVD-Based Adaptive Filtering

Overview
Date 2023 Jun 28
PMID 37370650
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is widely used as a treatment option for patients with movement disorders. In addition to its clinical impact, DBS has been utilized in the field of cognitive neuroscience, wherein the answers to several fundamental questions underpinning the mechanisms of neuromodulation in decision making rely on the ways in which a burst of DBS pulses, usually delivered at a clinical frequency, i.e., 130 Hz, perturb participants' choices. It was observed that neural activities recorded during DBS were contaminated with large artifacts, which lasts for a few milliseconds, as well as a low-frequency (slow) signal (~1-2 Hz) that can persist for hundreds of milliseconds. While the focus of most of methods for removing DBS artifacts was on the former, the artifact removal capabilities of the slow signal have not been addressed. In this work, we propose a new method based on combining singular value decomposition (SVD) and normalized adaptive filtering to remove both large (fast) and slow artifacts in local field potentials, recorded during a cognitive task in which bursts of DBS were utilized. Using synthetic data, we show that our proposed algorithm outperforms four commonly used techniques in the literature, namely, (1) normalized least mean square adaptive filtering, (2) optimal FIR Wiener filtering, (3) Gaussian model matching, and (4) moving average. The algorithm's capabilities are further demonstrated by its ability to effectively remove DBS artifacts in local field potentials recorded from the subthalamic nucleus during a verbal Stroop task, highlighting its utility in real-world applications.

Citing Articles

Reconstructing signal during brain stimulation with Stim-BERT: a self-supervised learning model trained on millions of iEEG files.

Menon K, Tcheng T, Seale C, Greene D, Morrell M, Desai S Front Artif Intell. 2025; 8:1502504.

PMID: 40040930 PMC: 11876146. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2025.1502504.

References
1.
Merrill D, Bikson M, Jefferys J . Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols. J Neurosci Methods. 2005; 141(2):171-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.10.020. View

2.
Sahai S, Effendi E, Mahoney E, Tucker H, Moolick B, Mamone G . Effects of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on neuronal spiking activity in the substantia nigra pars compacta in a rat model of Parkinson's disease. Neurosci Lett. 2020; 739:135443. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135443. View

3.
Santillan-Guzman A, Heute U, Muthuraman M, Stephani U, Galka A . DBS artifact suppression using a time-frequency domain filter. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013; 2013:4815-8. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610625. View

4.
Ramirez R, Kopell B, Butson C, Hiner B, Baillet S . Spectral signal space projection algorithm for frequency domain MEG and EEG denoising, whitening, and source imaging. Neuroimage. 2011; 56(1):78-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.002. View

5.
Qian X, Chen Y, Feng Y, Ma B, Hao H, Li L . A Method for Removal of Deep Brain Stimulation Artifact From Local Field Potentials. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017; 25(12):2217-2226. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2613412. View