» Articles » PMID: 37370320

Safety and Efficacy of a Single Procedure of Extraction and Reimplantation of Infected Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) in Comparison with Deferral Timing: An Observational Retrospective Multicentric Study

Abstract

(1) Background: Infections are among the most frequent and life-threatening complications of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome and safety of a single-procedure device extraction and contralateral implantation versus the standard-of-care (SoC) two-stage replacement for infected CIEDs. (2) Methods: We retrospectively included 66 patients with CIED infections who were treated at two Italian hospitals. Of the 66 patients enrolled in the study, 27 underwent a single procedure, whereas 39 received SoC treatment. All patients were followed up for 12 months after the procedure. (3) Results: Considering those lost to follow-up, there were no differences in the mortality rates between the two cohorts, with survival rates of 81.5% in the single-procedure group and 84.6% in the SoC group ( = 0.075). (4) Conclusions: Single-procedure reimplantation associated with an active antibiofilm therapy may be a feasible and effective therapeutic option in CIED-dependent and frail patients. Further studies are warranted to define the best treatment regimen and strategies to select patients suitable for the single-procedure reimplantation.

Citing Articles

One-year Impact of Clinical and Echocardiographic Parameters in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection after Transvenous Extraction.

Weisz S, Sordelli C, Fele N, Guarino A, Verde R, Zucchelli G J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2025; 34(4):196-202.

PMID: 39895886 PMC: 11784730. DOI: 10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_55_24.


An unusual cause of inappropriate shocks delivered by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Baldauf B, Lau E, Giaccardi M, Bonnemeier H BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024; 24(1):380.

PMID: 39039491 PMC: 11264391. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-024-04038-z.


Mortality and Costs of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) Infections According to the Therapeutic Approach: A Single-Center Cohort Study.

Gutierrez-Carretero E, Arana-Rueda E, Ortiz-Carrellan A, Pedrote-Martinez A, Garcia-de-la-Borbolla M, de Alarcon A Microorganisms. 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38543588 PMC: 10974394. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12030537.

References
1.
Barber K, Shammout Z, Smith J, Kebriaei R, Morrisette T, Rybak M . Biofilm Time-Kill Curves to Assess the Bactericidal Activity of Daptomycin Combinations against Biofilm-Producing Vancomycin-Resistant   and . Antibiotics (Basel). 2021; 10(8). PMC: 8388763. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10080897. View

2.
Chew D, Somayaji R, Conly J, Exner D, Rennert-May E . Timing of device reimplantation and reinfection rates following cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(9):e029537. PMC: 6731831. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029537. View

3.
Cuervo G, Escrihuela-Vidal F, Gudiol C, Carratala J . Current Challenges in the Management of Infective Endocarditis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8:641243. PMC: 7937698. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.641243. View

4.
Korkerdsup T, Ngarmukos T, Sungkanuparph S, Phuphuakrat A . Cardiac implantable electronic device infection in the cardiac referral center in Thailand: incidence, microbiology, risk factors, and outcomes. J Arrhythm. 2018; 34(6):632-639. PMC: 6288561. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12123. View

5.
Byrd C, Wilkoff B, Love C, Sellers T, Reiser C . Clinical study of the laser sheath for lead extraction: the total experience in the United States. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002; 25(5):804-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.t01-1-00804.x. View