» Articles » PMID: 37369467

Overall Survival Following Anastomotic Leakage After Surgery for Carcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal In Vivo
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Jun 27
PMID 37369467
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effect of anastomotic leakage, in patients who underwent surgery for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction, on overall survival (OS) is a debated and controversial topic. The aim of this systematic review was to clarify the impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy. A systematic literature review was carried out from 2000 to 2022. We chose articles reporting data from patients who underwent surgery for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Data regarding 1-, 3- and 5-year OS were analyzed. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding a total of 9,279 patients. Analyzing data from selected studies, anastomotic leakage was found to be associated with decreased OS in 5,456 cases while in the remaining 3,823 it had no impact on long term survival (p<0.05). However, this result did not emerge from the other studies considered in the systematic review. Anastomotic leakage is a severe postoperative complication, which seems to have an impact on overall survival. However, the topic remains debated and not supported by all case series included in this systematic review.

Citing Articles

The addition of pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy did not increase the risk of developing postoperative anastomotic leakage for ESCC: an analysis from a prospective cohort.

Qi W, Li S, Li H, Chen J, Zhao S BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):1029.

PMID: 39164624 PMC: 11337814. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12774-w.


Feasibility of utilizing mediastinal drains alone following esophageal cancer surgery: a retrospective study.

Li Y, Zhang D, Zhao D World J Surg Oncol. 2024; 22(1):118.

PMID: 38702817 PMC: 11067194. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03400-x.

References
1.
Peel A, Taylor E . Proposed definitions for the audit of postoperative infection: a discussion paper. Surgical Infection Study Group. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1991; 73(6):385-8. PMC: 2499458. View

2.
Martin L, Swisher S, Hofstetter W, Correa A, Mehran R, Rice D . Intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy are no longer associated with increased mortality. Ann Surg. 2005; 242(3):392-9. PMC: 1357747. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000179645.17384.12. View

3.
Rizk N, Bach P, Schrag D, Bains M, Turnbull A, Karpeh M . The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2003; 198(1):42-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.08.007. View

4.
Liberati A, Altman D, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche P, Ioannidis J . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009; 339:b2700. PMC: 2714672. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2700. View

5.
Ferri L, Law S, Wong K, Kwok K, Wong J . The influence of technical complications on postoperative outcome and survival after esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006; 13(4):557-64. DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2006.04.040. View