» Articles » PMID: 37367409

Surgical Mortality Risk Scores in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Is Their Early Predictive Value Still Strong?

Abstract

Background: Surgical mortality risk scores, even if not properly designed and rarely tested in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) setting, still guide the heart team in managing significant aortic stenosis.

Methods: After splitting 1763 consecutive patients retrospectively based on their mortality risk thresholds, the composite endpoint early safety (ES) was adjudicated according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 and -3 consensus documents.

Results: ES incidence was higher if VARC-2 rather than VARC-3 defined. Despite only patients showing VARC-2 ES had significantly lower absolute values of all three main risk scores, these last still failed to foresee both VARC-2 and -3 ES in intermediate-risk patients. The receiver operating characteristic analysis also showed a significant correlation, but with poor diagnostic accuracy, among the three scores and only VARC-2 ES; moreover, the absence of VARC-2 ES and low-osmolar contrast media administration were identified as independent predictors of 1-year mortality and absence of VARC-3 ES, respectively. Finally, even a single complication included in the ES definition could significantly affect 1-year mortality.

Conclusion: Currently, the most used mortality risk scores do not have adequate diagnostic accuracy in predicting ES after TAVI. The absence of VARC-2, instead of VARC-3, ES is an independent predictor of 1-year mortality.

Citing Articles

Perioperative Management of Valvular Heart Disease in Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery.

Jalali Y, Jalali M, Stevlik J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38892948 PMC: 11173198. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113240.


Fluoroscopy Time as a New Predictor of Short-Term Outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Cafaro A, Spione F, Burattini O, De Feo D, Xhelo A, Palmitessa C J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023; 10(11).

PMID: 37998517 PMC: 10671838. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10110459.

References
1.
Kappetein A, Head S, Genereux P, Piazza N, Van Mieghem N, Blackstone E . Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document (VARC-2). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012; 42(5):S45-60. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs533. View

2.
DErrigo P, Barbanti M, Ranucci M, Onorati F, Covello R, Rosato S . Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: results from an intermediate risk propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT study. Int J Cardiol. 2012; 167(5):1945-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.028. View

3.
Vontobel J, Possner M, Schutz P, Muller B, Taramasso M, Binder R . Early safety outcome following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is the amount of contrast media used a matter of concern?. Swiss Med Wkly. 2015; 145:w14238. DOI: 10.4414/smw.2015.14238. View

4.
Roques F, Nashef S, Michel P, Gauducheau E, De Vincentiis C, Baudet E . Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999; 15(6):816-22; discussion 822-3. DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00106-2. View

5.
Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J . 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: Developed by the Task Force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.... Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2022; 75(6):524. DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2022.05.006. View