» Articles » PMID: 37367243

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Nordic Walking and a Resistance Indoor Training Program: Anthropometric, Body Composition, and Functional Parameters in the Middle-Aged Population

Overview
Date 2023 Jun 27
PMID 37367243
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sedentary behaviors are increasing in the population, so strategies for the increment of physical activity levels are needed. The use of green space seems to be a valid support to be more active. The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a period of outdoor training (Nordic walking (NW)) with indoor resistance training (GYM) in a nonclinical population based on anthropometric characteristics, body composition, and functional parameters. This study was conducted on 102 participants (77 middle-aged people performed NW and 25 performed indoor training). Participants were measured twice: at baseline and after three months. Anthropometric measurements (weight, BMI, skinfolds, perimeters), body composition, bioelectrical impedance, vectorial analysis (BIA and BIVA), and physical tests were carried out. A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to evaluate the effect of the treatments, groups, and sexes. There were several intervention effects linked to a decrease in fat parameters (such as skinfolds, fat mass, and percentage of fat mass). Considering the type of intervention, NW showed a higher increase in muscle mass and a higher decrease in fat parameters than the GYM group. In conclusion, the two types of training could represent a good way to remain active and prevent sedentary behaviors.

Citing Articles

Oxygen Consumption, Ventilatory Thresholds, and Work Zones in Nordic Walking Competitors.

Serna-Martinez M, Ribes-Hernandez S, Martinez-Gonzalez-Moro I J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024; 9(3).

PMID: 39311279 PMC: 11417892. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk9030171.


Mechatronic Pole System for Monitoring the Correctness of Nordic Walking.

Wudarczyk S, Wozniewski M, Szpala A, Winiarski S, Balchanowski J Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(20).

PMID: 37896529 PMC: 10610925. DOI: 10.3390/s23208436.

References
1.
Braza M, Shoemaker W, Seeley A . Neighborhood design and rates of walking and biking to elementary school in 34 California communities. Am J Health Promot. 2004; 19(2):128-36. DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-19.2.128. View

2.
Souza M, Tomeleri C, Ribeiro A, Schoenfeld B, Silva A, Sardinha L . Effect of resistance training on phase angle in older women: A randomized controlled trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016; 27(11):1308-1316. DOI: 10.1111/sms.12745. View

3.
Lachowycz K, Jones A . Greenspace and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence. Obes Rev. 2011; 12(5):e183-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00827.x. View

4.
Cruz-Jentoft A, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T . Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2018; 48(1):16-31. PMC: 6322506. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy169. View

5.
Figard-Fabre H, Fabre N, Leonardi A, Schena F . Physiological and perceptual responses to Nordic walking in obese middle-aged women in comparison with the normal walk. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010; 108(6):1141-51. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-1315-z. View