» Articles » PMID: 3736601

Relation of Private or Clinic Care to the Cesarean Birth Rate

Overview
Journal N Engl J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1986 Sep 4
PMID 3736601
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The rising rate of cesarean births in the United States has been the focus of academic attention as well as attention from the media during the past decade. Although there is a consensus about the indications for cesarean delivery that have led to the increased rate (dystocia, malpresentation, fetal distress, and previous cesarean delivery), the influence of other key factors, such as whether the patient received care from a private physician or through a hospital clinic, has not been established. In a review of 65,647 deliveries in four Brooklyn hospitals between 1977 and 1982, we found that private physicians performed significantly more cesarean sections than house officers and attending physicians. Private patients giving birth to their first child were significantly more likely than clinic patients to undergo cesarean delivery if dystocia, malpresentation, or fetal distress was diagnosed, and private patients with one or more previous deliveries were significantly more likely to undergo cesarean delivery if dystocia or malpresentation was diagnosed. Private patients had fewer perinatal deaths, which were concentrated among infants with birth weights under 2000 g, but the infants of private patients had a significantly higher rate of low Apgar scores and birth injuries than the infants of clinic patients.

Citing Articles

Caesarean sections and health financing: a global analysis.

Hoxha I, Fink G BMJ Open. 2021; 11(5):e044383.

PMID: 34031111 PMC: 8149434. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044383.


Health system factors and caesarean sections in Kosovo: a cross-sectional study.

Hoxha I, Fejza A, Aliu M, Juni P, Goodman D BMJ Open. 2019; 9(4):e026702.

PMID: 30975683 PMC: 6500236. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026702.


Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hoxha I, Braha M, Syrogiannouli L, Goodman D, Juni P BMJ Open. 2019; 9(3):e025356.

PMID: 30833323 PMC: 6443081. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025356.


Caesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hoxha I, Syrogiannouli L, Luta X, Tal K, Goodman D, da Costa B BMJ Open. 2017; 7(2):e013670.

PMID: 28213600 PMC: 5318567. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013670.


Hospital differences in cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts (US) 2004-2006: the case against case-mix artifact.

Caceres I, Arcaya M, Declercq E, Belanoff C, Janakiraman V, Cohen B PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e57817.

PMID: 23526952 PMC: 3601117. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057817.