» Articles » PMID: 37365396

Impact of AI System on Recognition for Anatomical Landmarks Related to Reducing Bile Duct Injury During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Jun 26
PMID 37365396
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: According to the National Clinical Database of Japan, the incidence of bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy has hovered around 0.4% for the last 10 years and has not declined. On the other hand, it has been found that about 60% of BDI occurrences are due to misidentifying anatomical landmarks. However, the authors developed an artificial intelligence (AI) system that gave intraoperative data to recognize the extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD), cystic duct (CD), inferior border of liver S4 (S4), and Rouviere sulcus (RS). The purpose of this research was to evaluate how the AI system affects landmark identification.

Methods: We prepared a 20-s intraoperative video before the serosal incision of Calot's triangle dissection and created a short video with landmarks overwritten by AI. The landmarks were defined as landmark (LM)-EHBD, LM-CD, LM-RS, and LM-S4. Four beginners and four experts were recruited as subjects. After viewing a 20-s intraoperative video, subjects annotated the LM-EHBD and LM-CD. Then, a short video is shown with the AI overwriting landmark instructions; if there is a change in each perspective, the annotation is changed. The subjects answered a three-point scale questionnaire to clarify whether the AI teaching data advanced their confidence in verifying the LM-RS and LM-S4. Four external evaluation committee members investigated the clinical importance.

Results: In 43 of 160 (26.9%) images, the subjects transformed their annotations. Annotation changes were primarily observed in the gallbladder line of the LM-EHBD and LM-CD, and 70% of these shifts were considered safer changes. The AI-based teaching data encouraged both beginners and experts to affirm the LM-RS and LM-S4.

Conclusion: The AI system provided significant awareness to beginners and experts and prompted them to identify anatomical landmarks linked to reducing BDI.

Citing Articles

Development of an artificial intelligence system to indicate intraoperative findings of scarring in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis.

Orimoto H, Hirashita T, Ikeda S, Amano S, Kawamura M, Kawano Y Surg Endosc. 2025; 39(2):1379-1387.

PMID: 39838147 PMC: 11794413. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11514-2.


Artificial intelligence assisted operative anatomy recognition in endoscopic pituitary surgery.

Khan D, Valetopoulou A, Das A, Hanrahan J, Williams S, Bano S NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):314.

PMID: 39521895 PMC: 11550325. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01273-8.


Patient and hospital factors influence surgical approach in treatment of acute cholecystitis.

Huy T, Shenoy R, Russell M, Girgis M, Tomlinson J Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(12):7531-7537.

PMID: 39285035 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11227-6.


Standardization of a goal-oriented approach to acute cholecystitis: easy-to-follow steps for performing subtotal cholecystectomy.

Sunagawa H, Teruya M, Ohta T, Hayashi K, Orokawa T Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024; 409(1):251.

PMID: 39145913 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03438-1.


Artificial intelligence for surgical safety during laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Indication of anatomical landmarks related to postoperative pancreatic fistula using deep learning.

Aoyama Y, Matsunobu Y, Etoh T, Suzuki K, Fujita S, Aiba T Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(10):5601-5612.

PMID: 39093411 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11117-x.


References
1.
Madani A, Namazi B, Altieri M, Hashimoto D, Rivera A, Pucher P . Artificial Intelligence for Intraoperative Guidance: Using Semantic Segmentation to Identify Surgical Anatomy During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2020; 276(2):363-369. PMC: 8186165. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004594. View

2.
Tokuyasu T, Iwashita Y, Matsunobu Y, Kamiyama T, Ishikake M, Sakaguchi S . Development of an artificial intelligence system using deep learning to indicate anatomical landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2020; 35(4):1651-1658. PMC: 7940266. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07548-x. View

3.
Strasberg S, Hertl M, Soper N . An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995; 180(1):101-25. View

4.
Shiroshita H, Inomata M, Akira S, Kanayama H, Yamaguchi S, Eguchi S . Current Status of Endoscopic Surgery in Japan: The 15th National Survey of Endoscopic Surgery by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021; 15(2):415-426. DOI: 10.1111/ases.13012. View

5.
Brunt L, Deziel D, Telem D, Strasberg S, Aggarwal R, Asbun H . Safe Cholecystectomy Multi-society Practice Guideline and State of the Art Consensus Conference on Prevention of Bile Duct Injury During Cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2020; 272(1):3-23. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003791. View