» Articles » PMID: 37364525

An Experimental Evaluation of the Effects of Banning the Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products on Adolescents' and Young Adults' Future Nicotine Vaping Intentions

Overview
Journal Addict Behav
Date 2023 Jun 26
PMID 37364525
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Some U.S. states and municipalities have banned the sale of flavored tobacco products to help curb youth vaping. However, evidence supporting such bans is limited. This experiment tested whether removing flavored tobacco products from a retail setting diminished adolescents' (ages 11-20) future intentions to use vaping products.

Methods: The study was implemented in the RAND StoreLab, a life-sized model convenience store. The display of flavored tobacco products in the store was manipulated with these conditions: 1) tobacco, sweet, and menthol/mint flavors displayed; 2) only tobacco and menthol/mint displayed; and 3) only tobacco flavors displayed. Participants were randomly assigned to shop in one of these conditions and completed measures of future vaping intentions post-shopping. Separate logistic regression models assessed effect of condition on future intentions to use different flavors (tobacco-, menthol/mint-, and sweet-flavored) and any flavor (composite score across flavor categories) of vaping products.

Results: Study condition was not associated with intentions to use menthol/mint-, sweet-flavored, or any flavor. Compared to the condition in which all flavored products were displayed, removing menthol/mint- and sweet-flavored products significantly increased future intentions to use tobacco-flavored vaping products (OR = 3.97, 95 % CI [1.01, 15.58], p < .05). This effect was only observed among adolescents with history of vaping (OR = 11.30, 95 % CI [1.42, 89.96], p = .02).

Conclusions: Flavor bans may not affect adolescents' intentions to use menthol/mint, sweet, or "any" flavor of vaping products but may increase intentions to use tobacco-flavored products for teens who have already started vaping.

Citing Articles

Measuring susceptibility to use tobacco in an increasingly complex consumer marketplace: How many questions do we really need?.

Setodji C, Martino S, Dunbar M, Kim K, Jenson D, Wong J Psychol Addict Behav. 2024; 39(2):127-138.

PMID: 38421778 PMC: 11358647. DOI: 10.1037/adb0000997.


Does Reducing the Size of the Tobacco Power Wall Affect Young People's Risk of Future Use of Tobacco Products? An Experimental Investigation.

Martino S, Setodji C, Dunbar M, Jenson D, Wong J, Torbatian A J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2024; 85(2):234-243.

PMID: 38206655 PMC: 10941820. DOI: 10.15288/jsad.23-00174.

References
1.
Choi W, Gilpin E, Farkas A, Pierce J . Determining the probability of future smoking among adolescents. Addiction. 2001; 96(2):313-23. DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96231315.x. View

2.
Bar-Zeev Y, Berg C, Khayat A, Romm K, Wysota C, Abroms L . IQOS marketing strategies at point-of-sales: a cross-sectional survey with retailers. Tob Control. 2022; 32(e2):e198-e204. PMC: 9360187. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057083. View

3.
Martino S, Setodji C, Dunbar M, Shadel W . Increased attention to the tobacco power wall predicts increased smoking risk among adolescents. Addict Behav. 2018; 88:1-5. PMC: 6309187. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.07.024. View

4.
Leventhal A, Miech R, Barrington-Trimis J, Johnston L, OMalley P, Patrick M . Flavors of e-Cigarettes Used by Youths in the United States. JAMA. 2019; 322(21):2132-2134. PMC: 6865277. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.17968. View

5.
Kingsley M, Song G, Robertson J, Henley P, Ursprung W . Impact of flavoured tobacco restriction policies on flavoured product availability in Massachusetts. Tob Control. 2019; 29(2):175-182. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054703. View