Flourishing Together: The Longitudinal Effect of Goal Coordination on Goal Progress and Life Satisfaction in Romantic Relationships

Overview

Journal Int J Appl Posit Psychol

Date 2023 Jun 26

PMID 37361628

Authors

Orsolya Rosta-Filep

Csilla Lakatos

Barna Konkoly Thege

Viola Sallay

Tamas Martos

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Goal pursuit shapes people' everyday experiences and is deeply embedded within close relationships. Several studies have shown that goal support from romantic partners facilitates goal progress, and individual goal progress contributes to wellbeing. However, few pieces of research have examined the whole process, how efficient goal coordination in a romantic relationship contributes to life satisfaction through goal progress. In these studies, short time frames were used and only one aspect of goal coordination was examined. To generate more complex, long-term understanding we collected data from 148 married or cohabitating Hungarian heterosexual couples (mean age 39.71 ± 10.40 and 38.57 ± 10.00 years for men and women, respectively) in a two-wave longitudinal study with a year-long time window. Both partners individually completed an adapted version of the Personal Project Assessment and evaluated four chosen projects associated with project coordination (emotional support, communication, and cooperation) at baseline, and project attainment (progress, success, satisfaction) in the follow up. Life satisfaction was assessed during both waves. Results from the actor-partner interdependence mediation modeling revealed complete mediation, where project coordination increased project attainment one year later, and consequently associated with higher life satisfaction for both partners. The direct effect between project coordination and life satisfaction remained nonsignificant. This association indicates that for long-term life satisfaction, it is crucial to experience better goal outcomes as the result of the couple's collaborative effort.

References

Sadikaj G, Rappaport L, Moskowitz D, Zuroff D, Koestner R, Powers T . Consequences of interpersonal spin on couple-relevant goal progress and relationship satisfaction in romantic relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015; 109(4):722-37. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000043. View

Berli C, Bolger N, Shrout P, Stadler G, Scholz U . Interpersonal Processes of Couples' Daily Support for Goal Pursuit: The Example of Physical Activity. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017; 44(3):332-344. DOI: 10.1177/0146167217739264. View

Kenny D, Ledermann T . Detecting, measuring, and testing dyadic patterns in the actor-partner interdependence model. J Fam Psychol. 2010; 24(3):359-66. DOI: 10.1037/a0019651. View

Martos T, Sallay V, Nagy M, Gregus H, Filep O . Stress and Dyadic Coping in Personal Projects of Couples - A Pattern-Oriented Analysis. Front Psychol. 2019; 10:400. PMC: 6403151. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00400. View

Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen R, Griffin S . The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985; 49(1):71-5. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13. View

Overall N, Fletcher G, Simpson J . Helping each other grow: romantic partner support, self-improvement, and relationship quality. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010; 36(11):1496-513. DOI: 10.1177/0146167210383045. View

Jakubiak B, Feeney B . Daily goal progress is facilitated by spousal support and promotes psychological, physical, and relational well-being throughout adulthood. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016; 111(3):317-40. PMC: 5000864. DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000062. View

Zee K, Bolger N, Higgins E . Regulatory effectiveness of social support. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020; 119(6):1316-1358. DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000235. View

Yuan K, Chan W . Measurement invariance via multigroup SEM: Issues and solutions with chi-square-difference tests. Psychol Methods. 2016; 21(3):405-26. DOI: 10.1037/met0000080. View

10.

Fitzsimons G, Finkel E, VanDellen M . Transactive goal dynamics. Psychol Rev. 2015; 122(4):648-73. DOI: 10.1037/a0039654. View

11.

Vowels L, Carnelley K, Francois-Walcott R . Partner support and goal outcomes during COVID-19: A mixed methods study. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2021; 51(2):393-408. PMC: 8013747. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2745. View

12.

Marshall E, Gere J . Congruence and goal sharing of health-related goals among newly dating individuals explaining goal importance and commitment. Psychol Health. 2022; 38(12):1623-1634. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2037849. View

13.

Feeney B, Collins N . A new look at social support: a theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2014; 19(2):113-47. PMC: 5480897. DOI: 10.1177/1088868314544222. View

14.

Koestner R, Powers T, Carbonneau N, Milyavskaya M, Chua S . Distinguishing autonomous and directive forms of goal support: their effects on goal progress, relationship quality, and subjective well-being. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012; 38(12):1609-20. DOI: 10.1177/0146167212457075. View

15.

Molden D, Lucas G, Finkel E, Kumashiro M, Rusbult C . Perceived support for promotion-focused and prevention-focused goals: associations with well-being in unmarried and married couples. Psychol Sci. 2009; 20(7):787-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02362.x. View

16.

Fitzsimons G, Fishbach A . Shifting closeness: interpersonal effects of personal goal progress. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010; 98(4):535-49. DOI: 10.1037/a0018581. View

17.

Schindler I, Berg C, Butler J, T Fortenberry K, Wiebe D . Late-midlife and older couples' shared possible selves and psychological well-being during times of illness: the role of collaborative problem solving. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010; 65(4):416-24. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbq030. View

18.

Feeney B, Van Vleet M, Jakubiak B, Tomlinson J . Predicting the Pursuit and Support of Challenging Life Opportunities. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017; 43(8):1171-1187. DOI: 10.1177/0146167217708575. View

19.

Gable S, Reis H, Impett E, Asher E . What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004; 87(2):228-45. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228. View