» Articles » PMID: 37357867

Pattern Variation is Linked to Anti-predator Coloration in Butterfly Larvae

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Jun 26
PMID 37357867
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prey animals typically try to avoid being detected and/or advertise to would-be predators that they should be avoided. Both anti-predator strategies primarily rely on colour to succeed, but the specific patterning used is also important. While the role of patterning in camouflage is relatively clear, the design features of aposematic patterns are less well understood. Here, we use a comparative approach to investigate how pattern use varies across a phylogeny of 268 species of cryptic and aposematic butterfly larvae, which also vary in social behaviour. We find that longitudinal stripes are used more frequently by cryptic larvae, and that patterns putatively linked to crypsis are more likely to be used by solitary larvae. By contrast, aposematic larvae are more likely to use horizontal bands and spots, but we find no differences in the use of individual pattern elements between solitary and gregarious aposematic species. However, solitary aposematic larvae are more likely to display multiple pattern elements, whereas those with no pattern are more likely to be gregarious. Our study advances our understanding of how pattern variation, coloration and social behaviour covary across lepidopteran larvae, and highlights new questions about how patterning affects larval detectability and predator responses to aposematic prey.

References
1.
Michalis C, Scott-Samuel N, Gibson D, Cuthill I . Optimal background matching camouflage. Proc Biol Sci. 2017; 284(1858). PMC: 5524497. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0709. View

2.
Halpin C, Penacchio O, Lovell P, Cuthill I, Harris J, Skelhorn J . Pattern contrast influences wariness in naïve predators towards aposematic patterns. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):9246. PMC: 7280217. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65754-y. View

3.
Allen W, Baddeley R, Cuthill I, Scott-Samuel N . A quantitative test of the predicted relationship between countershading and lighting environment. Am Nat. 2012; 180(6):762-76. DOI: 10.1086/668011. View

4.
Servedio M . The effects of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration. Evolution. 2000; 54(3):751-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00077.x. View

5.
Kang C, Moon J, Lee S, Jablonski P . Camouflage through an active choice of a resting spot and body orientation in moths. J Evol Biol. 2012; 25(9):1695-702. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02557.x. View