Journal Impact Factors and the Future of Open Access Publishing

Overview

Journal J Appl Clin Med Phys

Specialties Biophysics
General Medicine

Date 2023 Jun 26

PMID 37357568

Authors

Susan L Richardson

Samantha G Hedrick

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

State of open science in cancer research.

Rius C, Liu Y, Sixto-Costoya A, Valderrama-Zurian J, Lucas-Dominguez R Clin Transl Oncol. 2024; 26(10):2457-2465.

PMID: 38635076 PMC: 11410906. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03468-7.

References

Bartholomew R . Science for sale: the rise of predatory journals. J R Soc Med. 2014; 107(10):384-5. PMC: 4206639. DOI: 10.1177/0141076814548526. View

Kelly J, Sadeghieh T, Adeli K . Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. EJIFCC. 2016; 25(3):227-43. PMC: 4975196. View

Ioannidis J, Pezzullo A, Boccia S . The Rapid Growth of Mega-Journals: Threats and Opportunities. JAMA. 2023; 329(15):1253-1254. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.3212. View

Schulz R, Barnett A, Bernard R, Brown N, Byrne J, Eckmann P . Is the future of peer review automated?. BMC Res Notes. 2022; 15(1):203. PMC: 9188010. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-022-06080-6. View

. Time to remodel the journal impact factor. Nature. 2016; 535(7613):466. DOI: 10.1038/535466a. View

Nielsen M, Andersen J . Global citation inequality is on the rise. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(7). PMC: 7896328. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2012208118. View

Bohannon J . Who's afraid of peer review?. Science. 2013; 342(6154):60-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.2013.342.6154.342_60. View

Howard J, Huang A, Li Z, Tufekci Z, Zdimal V, van der Westhuizen H . An evidence review of face masks against COVID-19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(4). PMC: 7848583. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2014564118. View

Hedrick S, Richardson S . EDI and open access: How JACMP is the future of ethical publishing-A tale in two parts. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022; 23(11):e13818. PMC: 9680568. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13818. View

10.

Koltun V, Hafner D . The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation. PLoS One. 2021; 16(6):e0253397. PMC: 8238192. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253397. View

11.

Hatch A, Curry S . Changing how we evaluate research is difficult, but not impossible. Elife. 2020; 9. PMC: 7423335. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.58654. View

12.

Cagan R . The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. Dis Model Mech. 2013; 6(4):869-70. PMC: 3701204. DOI: 10.1242/dmm.012955. View

13.

Mills M . The 20 anniversary of the JACMP. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019; 21(1):4-5. PMC: 6964760. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12802. View

14.

Garfield E . The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006; 295(1):90-3. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.1.90. View

15.

Hagve M . The money behind academic publishing. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2020; 140(11). DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.20.0118. View

16.

Kovanis M, Porcher R, Ravaud P, Trinquart L . The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise. PLoS One. 2016; 11(11):e0166387. PMC: 5104353. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166387. View

17.

Favaloro E . Measuring the quality of journals and journal articles: the impact factor tells but a portion of the story. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2008; 34(1):7-25. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1066030. View

18.

Hirsch J . An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(46):16569-72. PMC: 1283832. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102. View