Non-paretic Leg Movements Can Facilitate Cortical Drive to the Paretic Leg in Individuals Post Stroke with Severe Motor Impairment: Implications for Motor Priming

Overview

Journal Eur J Neurosci

Specialty Neurology

Date 2023 Jun 24

PMID 37354080

Authors

Hyosok Lim

Sangeetha Madhavan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Cross-education, a phenomenon where unilateral strength (or skill) training enhances strength (or skill) in the contralateral untrained limb, has been well studied in able-bodied individuals. Cross-education effect accompanies bilateral changes of corticomotor activity in the motor cortex (M1). Recent reports demonstrated greater cross-education effect in stroke survivors compared to healthy individuals, however, corticomotor responses to cross-education in stroke remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the effects of non-paretic leg movements on corticomotor excitability (CME) and reaction time of the paretic leg in severely impaired stroke survivors. Seventeen post stroke individuals with severe leg motor impairment (Fugl-Meyer lower extremity score less than 21 and absence of motor evoked potential in the paretic leg) performed three 20-min motor trainings using their non-paretic ankle: skill (targeted dynamic movements), strength (isometric resistance) and sham (sub-threshold electrical nerve stimulation). During training, verbal instructions were given to the participants to limit their movement to the non-paretic leg and this was confirmed with visual observation of the paretic leg. Transcranial magnetic stimulation measured CME of the contralateral pathways from the non-lesioned M1 to the non-paretic tibialis anterior (TA) muscle, ipsilateral pathways to the paretic TA and transcallosal inhibition (TCI) from the non-lesioned to lesioned M1. Paretic ankle reaction time was measured using a reaction time paradigm. All outcomes were measured before, immediately post, 30-min post and 60-min post priming. CME of the non-paretic TA increased after skill (.08 ± .10 mV) and strength (.06 ± .05 mV) training (p < .01). Ipsilateral CME of the paretic TA (.02 ± .01 mV) and TCI (.01 ± .01 s, ipsilateral silent period; more inhibition to the lesioned M1) increased after skill (p < .05) but not strength training. Reaction time of the paretic ankle improved after skill and strength training (-.11 ± .2 and -.13 ± .20 s, respectively; p < .05) and was sustained at 60 min. No changes were observed during the sham condition. Our findings may inform future studies for using non-paretic leg movements as a priming modality, especially for those who are contraindicated to other priming paradigms (e.g., brain stimulation) or unable to perform paretic leg movements. Conclusion: Non-paretic leg movements can be used as a priming modality, especially for those who are contraindicated to other priming paradigms (e.g., brain stimulation) or unable to perform paretic leg movements.

References

Seusing N, Strauss S, Fleischmann R, Nafz C, Groppa S, Muthuraman M . The excitability of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials is not task-specific and spatially distinct from the contralateral motor hotspot. Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(8):1851-1859. PMC: 11252234. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06851-6. View

Perna R, Temple J . Rehabilitation Outcomes: Ischemic versus Hemorrhagic Strokes. Behav Neurol. 2015; 2015:891651. PMC: 4515256. DOI: 10.1155/2015/891651. View

Leung M, Rantalainen T, Teo W, Kidgell D . Motor cortex excitability is not differentially modulated following skill and strength training. Neuroscience. 2015; 305:99-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.08.007. View

Cornwall M, McPoil T . The influence of tibialis anterior muscle activity on rearfoot motion during walking. Foot Ankle Int. 1994; 15(2):75-9. DOI: 10.1177/107110079401500205. View

Moseley A, Stark A, Cameron I, Pollock A . Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; (3):CD002840. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002840. View

Manca A, Dragone D, Dvir Z, Deriu F . Cross-education of muscular strength following unilateral resistance training: a meta-analysis. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017; 117(11):2335-2354. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-017-3720-z. View

Hortobagyi T, Pirio Richardson S, Lomarev M, Shamim E, Meunier S, Russman H . Interhemispheric plasticity in humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 43(7):1188-99. PMC: 4137570. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31820a94b8. View

Trunk B, Ziegler L, Gharabaghi A . Ipsilateral corticospinal maps correspond to severe poststroke motor impairment. Brain Stimul. 2022; 15(3):758-760. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.05.007. View

Perez M, Cohen L . Mechanisms underlying functional changes in the primary motor cortex ipsilateral to an active hand. J Neurosci. 2008; 28(22):5631-40. PMC: 2440822. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0093-08.2008. View

10.

Dierick F, Dehas M, Isambert J, Injeyan S, Bouche A, Bleyenheuft Y . Hemorrhagic versus ischemic stroke: Who can best benefit from blended conventional physiotherapy with robotic-assisted gait therapy?. PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0178636. PMC: 5456343. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178636. View

11.

Leung M, Rantalainen T, Teo W, Kidgell D . The ipsilateral corticospinal responses to cross-education are dependent upon the motor-training intervention. Exp Brain Res. 2018; 236(5):1331-1346. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5224-4. View

12.

Ehrensberger M, Simpson D, Broderick P, Blake C, Horgan F, Hickey P . Unilateral Strength Training and Mirror Therapy in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 98(8):657-665. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001162. View

13.

Fling B, Seidler R . Task-dependent effects of interhemispheric inhibition on motor control. Behav Brain Res. 2011; 226(1):211-7. PMC: 3208314. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.09.018. View

14.

Lim H, Madhavan S . Effects of Cross-Education on Neural Adaptations Following Non-Paretic Limb Training in Stroke: A Scoping Review with Implications for Neurorehabilitation. J Mot Behav. 2022; 55(1):111-124. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2022.2106935. View

15.

Stinear C, Barber P, Coxon J, Fleming M, Byblow W . Priming the motor system enhances the effects of upper limb therapy in chronic stroke. Brain. 2008; 131(Pt 5):1381-90. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awn051. View

16.

Jorgensen H, Nakayama H, Raaschou H, Olsen T . Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 76(1):27-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80038-7. View

17.

Mason J, Frazer A, Horvath D, Pearce A, Avela J, Howatson G . Ipsilateral corticomotor responses are confined to the homologous muscle following cross-education of muscular strength. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2017; 43(1):11-22. DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0457. View

18.

Goldsworthy M, Hordacre B, Ridding M . Minimum number of trials required for within- and between-session reliability of TMS measures of corticospinal excitability. Neuroscience. 2016; 320:205-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.012. View

19.

Christensen L, Andersen J, Sinkjaer T, Nielsen J . Transcranial magnetic stimulation and stretch reflexes in the tibialis anterior muscle during human walking. J Physiol. 2001; 531(Pt 2):545-57. PMC: 2278473. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0545i.x. View

20.

Carroll T, Riek S, Carson R . The sites of neural adaptation induced by resistance training in humans. J Physiol. 2002; 544(Pt 2):641-52. PMC: 2290590. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.024463. View