» Articles » PMID: 37353740

Protocol for a Prospective Study Evaluating Circulating Tumour Cells Status to Predict Radical Prostatectomy Treatment Failure in Localised Prostate Cancer Patients (C-ProMeta-1)

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Jun 23
PMID 37353740
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Treatment decisions in prostate cancer (PCa) rely on disease stratification between localised and metastatic stages, but current imaging staging technologies are not sensitive to micro-metastatic disease. Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) status is a promising tool in this regard. The Parsortix® CTC isolation system employs an epitope-independent approach based on cell size and deformability to increase the capture rate of CTCs. Here, we present a protocol for prospective evaluation of this method to predict post radical prostatectomy (RP) PCa cancer recurrence.

Methods: We plan to recruit 294 patients diagnosed with unfavourable intermediate, to high and very high-risk localised PCa. Exclusion criteria include synchronous cancer diagnosis or prior PCa treatment, including hormone therapy. RP is performed according to the standard of care. Two blood samples (20 ml) are collected before and again 3-months after RP. The clinical team are blinded to CTC results and the laboratory researchers are blinded to clinical information. Treatment failure is defined as a PSA ≥ 0.2 mg/ml, start of salvage treatment or imaging-proven metastatic lesions. The CTC analysis entails enumeration and RNA analysis of gene expression in captured CTCs. The primary outcome is the accuracy of CTC status to predict post-RP treatment failure at 4.5 years. Observed sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values will be reported. Specificity will be presented over time.

Discussion: CTC status may reflect the true potential for PCa metastasis and may predict clinical outcomes better than the current PCa progression risk grading systems. Therefore establishing a robust biomarker for predicting treatment failure in localized high-risk PCa would significantly enhance guidance in treatment decision-making, optimizing cure rates while minimizing unnecessary harm from overtreatment.

Trial Registration: ISRCTN17332543.

References
1.
Rider J, Sandin F, Andren O, Wiklund P, Hugosson J, Stattin P . Long-term outcomes among noncuratively treated men according to prostate cancer risk category in a nationwide, population-based study. Eur Urol. 2012; 63(1):88-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.001. View

2.
Wilt T, Ullman K, Linskens E, MacDonald R, Brasure M, Ester E . Therapies for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Effectiveness Review. J Urol. 2020; 205(4):967-976. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001578. View

3.
Allard W, Matera J, Miller M, Repollet M, Connelly M, Rao C . Tumor cells circulate in the peripheral blood of all major carcinomas but not in healthy subjects or patients with nonmalignant diseases. Clin Cancer Res. 2004; 10(20):6897-904. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0378. View

4.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. View

5.
Liu H, Ding J, Wu Y, Wu D, Qi J . Prospective Study of the Clinical Impact of Epithelial and Mesenchymal Circulating Tumor Cells in Localized Prostate Cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2020; 12:4549-4560. PMC: 7304675. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S253997. View