» Articles » PMID: 37351803

Serial Progesterone Levels More Accurately Predict the Time of Ovulation in Subfertile Women: a Prospective Cohort Study

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Jun 23
PMID 37351803
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To predict ovulation in subfertile women using serial follicular growth (FG) and serum hormone measures (estradiol (E2), luteinizing hormone (LH), and progesterone (P) levels) in mathematical models.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study of 116 subfertile women aged between 18 and 40 years. FG was assessed by serial transvaginal ultrasonography starting from cycle days 8-12, depending on cycle length. Once the dominant follicle reached 15-16 mm, hormone levels were assessed daily. The primary outcome measure was ovulation (O), with a serum LH level ≥15 IU/l defining the start of the LH surge (the day prior to ovulation) and a serum P level >1 μg/ml concurrent with a drop in serum E2 levels indicating O. To determine O, mathematical models were generated using FG, LH, E2, and P measurements.

Results: A mathematical model was constructed using exponential regression to relate days until and after ovulation with P levels. The O(P) model was found to be superior to the O(LH) model in the prediction of O, with high R2 and low RMSE values of 0.9983 and 0.2454, respectively. In the range of [-2, 2] days, the net accuracy of the O(P) model was 63.0%, while with an allowed one-day error, the accuracy was 99.6%.

Conclusion: Serum P levels display a highly predictable linear curve in natural cycles, which enables the prediction of ovulation. The O(P) model can be independently used to schedule embryo transfer in natural frozen-thaw cycles and could therefore replace the O(LH) model in clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Preovulatory progesterone levels are the top indicator for ovulation prediction based on machine learning model evaluation: a retrospective study.

Li Y, Zeng H, Fu J J Ovarian Res. 2024; 17(1):169.

PMID: 39169388 PMC: 11337897. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-024-01495-0.

References
1.
Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, Zhang H, Wei D, Zhang Y . Transfer of Fresh versus Frozen Embryos in Ovulatory Women. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(2):126-136. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705334. View

2.
Malcolm C, Cumming D . Does anovulation exist in eumenorrheic women?. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102(2):317-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00527-1. View

3.
Mumusoglu S, Polat M, Ozbek I, Bozdag G, Papanikolaou E, Esteves S . Preparation of the Endometrium for Frozen Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021; 12:688237. PMC: 8299049. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.688237. View

4.
Schliep K, Mumford S, Hammoud A, Stanford J, Kissell K, Sjaarda L . Luteal phase deficiency in regularly menstruating women: prevalence and overlap in identification based on clinical and biochemical diagnostic criteria. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 99(6):E1007-14. PMC: 4037737. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-3534. View

5.
Roos J, Johnson S, Weddell S, Godehardt E, Schiffner J, Freundl G . Monitoring the menstrual cycle: Comparison of urinary and serum reproductive hormones referenced to true ovulation. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2015; 20(6):438-50. DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2015.1048331. View