» Articles » PMID: 37351398

A Comparative Evaluation of Nickel-titanium Wires and Clear Aligners in the Management of Mandibular Incisor Crowding

Overview
Journal J Orthod Sci
Date 2023 Jun 23
PMID 37351398
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To compare nickel-titanium (NiTi) wires and clear aligners in the management of mandibular incisor crowding.

Methods: Seventy-two participants were arbitrarily alienated into two groups with 36 samples in each. Group I participants were treated with NiTi arch wires and group II participants with clear aligners. Malocclusion was evaluated using Little's irregularity index. A questionnaire was applied to record the discomfort levels. Patients were recalled regularly at four weeks, eight weeks, and twelve weeks.

Results: At baseline, the mean score was 2.91 mm and 2.72 mm; at 4 weeks, it was 1.64 mm and1.48 mm; at 8 weeks, it was 0.98 mm and1.0 mm; and at 12 weeks, it was 0.68 mm and 0.52 mm in groups I and II, respectively. The mean change in Little's irregularity index score at 4 weeks was 1.27 mm and 1.24 mm; at 8 weeks, it was 0.66 mm and 0.48 mm; and at 12 weeks, it was 0.30 mm and 0.48 mm in groups I and II, respectively. The disparity was not-considerable ( > 0.05). The mean discomfort score at baseline was 2.8 and 2.5; at 4 weeks, it was 2.4 and 2.0; at 8 weeks, it was 1.8 and 1.4; and at 12 weeks, it was 1.3 and 1.0 for groups I and II correspondingly. The disparity was non-significant ( > 0.05).

Conclusion: From the present study, it was found that both NiTi wires and clear aligners were equally effective in managing mandibular anterior crowding cases.

Citing Articles

Efficiency of clear aligners with nickel titanium wires for treating mandibular incisor crowding.

Verghese Y, Savana K, Khattar B, Altaher Mohammed O, Batham P, Pereira Kalia U Bioinformation. 2024; 20(8):917-920.

PMID: 39411771 PMC: 11471407. DOI: 10.6026/973206300200917.


The Role of Sulfhydryl (Thiols) Groups in Oral and Periodontal Diseases.

Cerkezi S, Nakova M, Gorgoski I, Ferati K, Bexheti-Ferati A, Palermo A Biomedicines. 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38672236 PMC: 11048028. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12040882.

References
1.
Djeu G, Shelton C, Maganzini A . Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128(3):292-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.06.002. View

2.
West A, Jones M, Newcombe R . Multiflex versus superelastic: a randomized clinical trial of the tooth alignment ability of initial arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 108(5):464-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70046-3. View

3.
Zheng M, Liu R, Ni Z, Yu Z . Efficiency, effectiveness and treatment stability of clear aligners: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017; 20(3):127-133. DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12177. View

4.
Gravina M, Brunharo I, Fraga M, Artese F, Campos M, Vitral R . Clinical evaluation of dental alignment and leveling with three different types of orthodontic wires. Dental Press J Orthod. 2013; 18(6):31-7. DOI: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000600006. View

5.
Sergl H, Klages U, Zentner A . Pain and discomfort during orthodontic treatment: causative factors and effects on compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 114(6):684-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70201-x. View