Is Reading Fiction Associated with a Higher Mind-reading Ability? Two Conceptual Replication Studies in Japan

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2023 Jun 22

PMID 37347739

Authors

Yuka Takahashi

Toshiyuki Himichi

Ayumi Masuchi

Daisuke Nakanishi

Yohsuke Ohtsubo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Previous studies have revealed that reading fiction is associated with dispositional empathy and theory-of-mind abilities. Earlier studies established a correlation between fiction reading habits and the two measures of social cognition: trait fantasy (i.e., the tendency to transpose oneself into fictitious characters) and performance on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET; a test of the ability to identify others' mental states based on their eyes). Recently, experimental studies have shown that brief exposure to fiction enhances RMET performance. Nevertheless, these studies have been conducted only in Western countries, and few published studies have investigated these relationships in Asian countries. This research aims to address this gap. Study 1, which involved 338 Japanese undergraduates, conceptually replicated the previously reported correlations between fiction reading and fantasy and RMET scores (after statistically controlling for the effect of outliers). However, Study 2, which involved 304 Japanese undergraduates, failed to replicate the causal relationship. Participants read an excerpt either from literary fiction or from nonfiction, or engaged in a calculation task, before completing the RMET. Brief exposure to literary fiction did not increase the RMET score. In sum, this study replicated the associations of fiction reading with fantasy and RMET scores in Japan, but failed to replicate the causal relationship.

References

Kirman A, Teschl M . Selfish or selfless? The role of empathy in economics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009; 365(1538):303-17. PMC: 2827457. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0192. View

Dodell-Feder D, Tamir D . Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018; 147(11):1713-1727. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000395. View

Quinlan J, Padgett J, Khajehnassiri A, Mar R . Does a brief exposure to literary fiction improve social ability? Assessing the evidential value of published studies with a p-curve. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022; 152(3):723-732. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001302. View

Kidd D, Castano E . Panero et al. (2016): Failure to replicate methods caused the failure to replicate results. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017; 112(3):e1-e4. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000072. View

Higgins W, Ross R, Langdon R, Polito V . The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test Shows Poor Psychometric Properties in a Large, Demographically Representative U.S. Sample. Assessment. 2022; 30(6):1777-1789. DOI: 10.1177/10731911221124342. View

Black J . An IRT Analysis of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test. J Pers Assess. 2018; 101(4):425-433. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1447946. View

Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I . The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001; 42(2):241-51. View

Wakabayashi A, Tojo Y, Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S . [The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) Japanese version: evidence from high-functioning clinical group and normal adults]. Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2005; 75(1):78-84. DOI: 10.4992/jjpsy.75.78. View

Olderbak S, Wilhelm O, Olaru G, Geiger M, Brenneman M, Roberts R . A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:1503. PMC: 4593947. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01503. View

10.

Khorashad B, Baron-Cohen S, Roshan G, Kazemian M, Khazai L, Aghili Z . The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test: Investigation of Psychometric Properties and Test-Retest Reliability of the Persian Version. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015; 45(9):2651-66. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-015-2427-4. View

11.

Adams Jr R, Rule N, Franklin Jr R, Wang E, Stevenson M, Yoshikawa S . Cross-cultural reading the mind in the eyes: an fMRI investigation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009; 22(1):97-108. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21187. View

12.

. PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 2015; 349(6251):aac4716. DOI: 10.1126/science.aac4716. View

13.

Panero M, Weisberg D, Black J, Goldstein T, Barnes J, Brownell H . No support for the claim that literary fiction uniquely and immediately improves theory of mind: A reply to Kidd and Castano's commentary on Panero et al. (2016). J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017; 112(3):e5-e8. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000079. View

14.

Himichi T, Osanai H, Goto T, Fujita H, Kawamura Y, Davis M . [Development of a Japanese version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index]. Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2018; 88(1):61-71. DOI: 10.4992/jjpsy.88.15218. View

15.

McCullough M, Worthington Jr E, Rachal K . Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997; 73(2):321-36. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.73.2.321. View

16.

Camerer C, Dreber A, Holzmeister F, Ho T, Huber J, Johannesson M . Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nat Hum Behav. 2019; 2(9):637-644. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z. View

17.

Samur D, Tops M, Koole S . Does a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhanced mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and Castano (2013). Cogn Emot. 2017; 32(1):130-144. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1279591. View

18.

Kidd D, Castano E . Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science. 2013; 342(6156):377-80. DOI: 10.1126/science.1239918. View

19.

Blair R, Jones L, Clark F, Smith M . The psychopathic individual: a lack of responsiveness to distress cues?. Psychophysiology. 1997; 34(2):192-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02131.x. View

20.

Pino M, Mazza M . The Use of "Literary Fiction" to Promote Mentalizing Ability. PLoS One. 2016; 11(8):e0160254. PMC: 4973931. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160254. View