» Articles » PMID: 37347018

Long-term Quality of Life in Patients After ACL Reconstruction With Concomitant Meniscal Injury Treatment: Patient-Reported Outcomes at Minimum 10-Year Follow-up

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Jun 22
PMID 37347018
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Long-term studies of patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with or without concomitant meniscal tear treatment are limited.

Purposes: To (1) report postoperative outcomes after anatomic ACL reconstruction with a hamstring autograft, (2) investigate how concomitant treatment of meniscal injury could affect these outcomes, and (3) evaluate the association between quality of life and activity levels at a minimum 10-year follow-up.

Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Patients treated with a unilateral, anatomic ACL reconstruction between 2005 and 2011 were investigated. The following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were reported for the overall sample as well as a subsample of patients with meniscal injury: International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L), and patient satisfaction. Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), and meniscal injury treatment (meniscectomy vs meniscal repair) were examined as patient-specific risk factors regarding long-term activity and quality of life.

Results: Overall, 106 patients, 90 men (85%) and 16 women (15%), were enrolled in the study, with a mean follow-up of 13.2 years. The ACL retear rate was 2.8%. The mean scores were 80.6 ± 16.7 (IKDC-SKF), 87.4 ± 15.0 (KOOS), 90.5 ± 11.5 (Lysholm), 5.6 ± 1.9 (Tegner), and 91.8 ± 14.5 (EQ-5D-5L). The majority (90.6%) of patients considered their knee state satisfactory during follow-up. When compared with patients who underwent meniscal repair, patients who underwent meniscectomy had statistically significantly lower scores on all PROMs except for the Tegner and EQ-5D-5L ( < .05 for all). The mean difference between the 2 groups was ≥7 points on all PROM scores. Patient sex, age, and BMI did not affect PROM scores. There was a statistically significant, strong positive correlation between quality of life and activity.

Conclusion: Patients had few or no symptoms and considered their knee state satisfactory 13.2 years after anatomic ACL reconstruction. Patients with concomitant meniscal tears having undergone meniscal repair had improved PROMs compared with those treated with meniscectomy. Finally, participation in activities of daily living and sports was interrelated with quality of life and was not affected by patient age, sex, or BMI.

Citing Articles

Association of Preoperative Cartilage T1ρ Values With Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis 10 Years After Anatomical Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction: Follow-up of a Previous Prospective Study.

Watanabe S, Sakamoto T, Horii M, Kimura S, Yamaguchi S, Ohtori S Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(1):23259671241307672.

PMID: 39866954 PMC: 11758552. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241307672.


Longitudinal Changes in Medial Meniscal Extrusion After ACL Injury and Reconstruction and Its Relationship With Cartilage Degeneration Assessed Using MRI-Based T1ρ and T2 Analysis.

Watanabe S, Joseph G, Sato D, Lansdown D, Brandao Guimaraes J, Link T Am J Sports Med. 2025; 53(2):350-359.

PMID: 39743985 PMC: 11796289. DOI: 10.1177/03635465241305734.


A Single-Center, Observational Study Assessing Functional Outcomes After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Suspensory Tibial Fixation With a Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Button.

Adkar N, Thareja S, Kerhalkar R, Sadalagi P Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e64779.

PMID: 39156308 PMC: 11329805. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.64779.

References
1.
Tsoukas D, Fotopoulos V, Basdekis G, Makridis K . No difference in osteoarthritis after surgical and non-surgical treatment of ACL-injured knees after 10 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 24(9):2953-2959. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3593-9. View

2.
Koumantakis G, Tsoligkas K, Papoutsidakis A, Ververidis A, Drosos G . Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in Greek. J Orthop Traumatol. 2015; 17(2):123-9. PMC: 4882291. DOI: 10.1007/s10195-015-0362-y. View

3.
Kunze K, Fabricant P, Marx R, Nwachukwu B . Perspectives on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Sports Medicine Surgeon: Implications for Current and Future Care. Clin Sports Med. 2020; 40(1):213-220. PMC: 7442913. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2020.08.014. View

4.
Barenius B, Ponzer S, Shalabi A, Bujak R, Norlen L, Eriksson K . Increased risk of osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 14-year follow-up study of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42(5):1049-57. DOI: 10.1177/0363546514526139. View

5.
Pinczewski L, Clingeleffer A, Otto D, Bonar S, Corry I . Integration of hamstring tendon graft with bone in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy. 1997; 13(5):641-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(97)90194-8. View