» Articles » PMID: 37343005

The Association Between the Risk Perceptions of COVID-19, Trust in the Government, Political Ideologies, and Socio-demographic Factors: A Year-long Cross-sectional Study in South Korea

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 Jun 21
PMID 37343005
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Risk perception research, targeting the general public, necessitates the study of the multi-faceted aspects of perceived risk through a holistic approach. This study aimed to investigate the association between the two dimensions of risk perception of COVID-19, i.e., risk as a feeling and analysis, trust in the current government, political ideologies, and socio-demographic factors in South Korea. This study used a year-long repeated cross-sectional design, in which a national sample (n = 23,018) participated in 23 consecutive telephone surveys from February 2020 to February 2021. Most factors differed in the magnitude and direction of their relationships with the two dimensions of risk perception. However, trust in the current government, alone, delineated an association in the same direction for both dimensions, i.e., those with a lower level of trust exhibited higher levels of cognitive and affective risk perception. Although these results did not change significantly during the one-year observation period, they are related to the political interpretation of risk. This study revealed that affective and cognitive risk perceptions addressed different dimensions of risk perception. These findings could help governments and health authorities better understand the nature and mechanisms of public risk perception when implementing countermeasures and policies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and other public health emergencies.

Citing Articles

Correction: The association between the risk perceptions of COVID-19, trust in the government, political ideologies, and socio-demographic factors: A year-long cross-sectional study in South Korea.

Lee Y, Heo H, Noh H, Jang D, Choi Y, Jang W PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0314924.

PMID: 39621635 PMC: 11611200. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314924.


The changing nature of worry about COVID-19 among the English public: a secondary analysis of 73 national, cross-sectional surveys, January 2020 to April 2022.

James Rubin G, Smith L, Amlot R, Fear N, Potts H, Michie S BMJ Open. 2024; 14(10):e088027.

PMID: 39433418 PMC: 11499761. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088027.


The strongest predictors of compliance with health protocols among marketers and guilds based on the transtheoretical model.

Moslehi S, Tavan A, Narimani S, Shahbazzadeh F, Sedri N, Sabahi S BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1892.

PMID: 39010015 PMC: 11251113. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19386-w.

References
1.
Scott S, Poulin M, Silver R . A lifespan perspective on terrorism: age differences in trajectories of response to 9/11. Dev Psychol. 2012; 49(5):986-98. DOI: 10.1037/a0028916. View

2.
Weil A, Wolfe C . Individual differences in risk perception and misperception of COVID-19 in the context of political ideology. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021; 36(1):19-31. PMC: 8652668. DOI: 10.1002/acp.3894. View

3.
Lerner J, Li Y, Valdesolo P, Kassam K . Emotion and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014; 66:799-823. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043. View

4.
Siegrist M, Arvai J . Risk Perception: Reflections on 40 Years of Research. Risk Anal. 2020; 40(S1):2191-2206. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13599. View

5.
Qiao S, Li Z, Liang C, Li X, Rudisill C . Three dimensions of COVID-19 risk perceptions and their socioeconomic correlates in the United States: A social media analysis. Risk Anal. 2022; 43(6):1174-1186. PMC: 9350290. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13993. View